Month: May 2013

The ‘Flora’s Secret’ ca. 1790 shoes

You may have guessed from Saturday’s post that I’m working on shoes.  It was the first time that I’ve really tried to remake a pair of modern shoes into historical shoes, and it was an interesting process. The shoes started like this: cute, but a bit daft: I wanted them to look like these type of shoes: Mine don’t come as high up in the toe and around the foot, but there are example of shoes from the 1780s & ’90s that are cut lower over the toe and the sides of the foot: I liked the idea of being able to wear the shoes for anything from 1780 to 1800- more versatile. To re-make mine, first I took off the silly trim and bow: Then I cleaned the shoes. The next step was to re-paint the heel, to get rid of the anachronistic metallic teal leather colour. I first painted the heels pale blue, but it turned out too blue: I repainted the heels lavender, which I’m not much happier with.  I’ll repaint them …

Rate the dress: tan and red in 1875

Last week I showed you a flower-strewn frock by Jean-Phillipe Worth, one that might have been a little too frilly and feminine, but which most of you found fabulous. While I don’t think Worth, original or JP, quite as infallible as some of you did, I wasn’t surprised that this frock received high accolades.  One of two of you flat-out hated the dress, and there were a few complaints about the symmetrical placement of motifs over the bust, the overall fussiness of the bust, and the colour of the creamy silk and blonde lace (I definitely don’t agree that the dress has faded over time – all the different layers of dark ivory matched too well, and were too true, for age to have changed them substantially), but the frock still managed an 8.7 out of 10. Can this week match that? This fortnight’s theme on the HSF is Literature, and I was rather at a loss as to how that could fit in with Rate the Dress.  In looking for inspiration, I found this …

Things that you can make with squares and rectangles and triangles

People often say to me “Oh, I can’t believe you do historic sewing.  That must be so complicated!”.  It really isn’t!  Partly this is because it’s just a different skill set, but not a harder one, but partly because the shapes used for a lot of historic garments are actually pretty basic. So what can you make with squares and rectangles and triangles? The oldest extent garment is all squares and rectangles: As is pretty much every tunic and chemise since then, from the middle ages to the early 19th century: Most petticoats are just rectangles of fabric pleated into waistbands: As are mid-19th century skirts, for all their tiers of rectangular ruffles: Fichus and handkerchiefs and buffons and neckerchiefs and pocket handkerchiefs (what’s the difference?  I’ll be discussing them in an upcoming terminology post.) are all made of squares or rectangles or triangles: Muffs are essentially just layers of rectangles:   Many aprons are rectangles: As are many reticules, purses and variants thereof: Plus, there are all the ethnic costumes based on basic shapes …