Year: 2011

Talk about un-natural shoe shapes…

If you thought that last week’s red boots were un-natural in shape, check out these shoes from the Powerhouse Museum in Australia: Look at those insteps!  Now, I’m high unusually high in the instep and the arch, but that is ridiculous! I do love the detailing on these shoes: the scrolls around the toe, the buttons, and most of all the tiny blue leather fleur-de-lys, or Chinese inspired patterns. They were made as exhibition pieces to show off the shoe-makers skill, so perhaps actually fitting a real person wasn’t an important skill for a cobbler!

Children in adult’s clothes – the ‘ick’ factor

Every time I have posted an image of an portrait of a child from pre-1800, the issue of children wearing adult’s clothes and our discomfort with historical children’s clothes has been raised. Mariana Victoria in her lovely blue frock incited a particularly lively discussion (following all the comments has been lots of fun from my end!).  We all loved her dress, but some of us were rather uncomfortable with the way she was portrayed (the ‘ick’ factor), some of us felt that while it wasn’t exactly practical, it made lovely dress up clothes for a seven year old, and some of us didn’t understand what all the fuss was about at all. I think our perspective on historical children’s wear, and the discomfort we often feel about it, is based on three factors: Practicality.  Many portraits of upper-class children in the 16th-18th centuries show them in clothes that look uncomfortable, restrictive, and unsuitable for the activities we associate with children (playing and getting dirty). Sexualisation.  Formal historical children’s clothes tended to emphasize, and create, the …

So chic!

I adore this routine from Victor Victoria. Mrs C introduced me to it.  It’s so…fabulous. Now I’m introducing you to it.  Two things you should know: 1) The clip, depending on how much of a prude you are, might be NSFW 2) Don’t bother watching it without the sound on.