All posts filed under: 19th Century

Terminology: What is botany wool?

Botany wool, often known simply as botany (though I find the ‘wool’ part helpful in differentiating it from the general ‘flowers and trees’ type of botany) is an early name for merino wool produced in the Antipodes. (OK, so I’m not 100% sure that suit is made of Botany wool.  But it might very well be.  And it’s spectacular.  And there are only so many images of socks I can show you). In the 19th century it was spun into cloth and used in outer wear, and so the term ‘botany wool’ could mean the fabric, not the raw materials.  In the 20th century it has mainly been used in knit sweaters and hosiery, though as late as 1922 you could still buy ‘Botany wool’ serge. According to most dictionaries, the term arose in the 1880s, when the Australian wool industry was established enough to export in reasonable quantities.  However, there are advertisements describing cloth as ‘botany’ in New Zealand at the end of the 1870s, so it may be a bit older. It was …

Rate the Dress: ruffly pink party frock of the late 1860s

Goodness was last week’s acid green Callot Soers dress controversial and divisive!  You either really, really, really love it.  Or really didn’t.  If I’d gone with everyone who rated it 6 and over it would have come out an 8.1 out of 10.  If I’d gone with everyone who rated it 5 and under it it would have rated a 3 out of 10.  Combined, the rating comes to a 6.5 out of 10, which is a rating that no-one gave it on their own! It’s Valentine’s day, and even though I’m not a Valentines fan at all I thought it was a good excuse to show you something ruffly and pink. I failed to find a suitable frock that was quite and pink and quite as ruffly as I had hoped, but I did find this sweet but slightly restrained  pink and cream party frock from the MFA Boston. Doesn’t this girls dress with its stripes and panniered overskirt just speak of old fashioned Valentines: all flower garlands and cupids, and maybe just a …

Rate the Dress: Wallflower or wower of 1840

So, last week I made a silly mistake and published two Rate the Dresses.  I noticed it a few hours later and withdrew the one I hadn’t meant to publish. So most of you only saw the 1780s pastel polonaised froof that I left up (and most of didn’t particularly care for it and rated it a not-very inspiring 5.2 out of 10).  But some of you did get a sneak-peek at this week’s Rate the Dress, so have had all week to think about whether you like it or not.. 1840s dresses can be a bit, well, plain and boring. This dress comes in a typically boring 1840s colour: rust brown, but does include some quite distinctive features: beautifully worked tone-on-tone embroidery (click on the image to go through to a large version), triple puffed sleeves, two rows of hem ruffles, and a cunningly cut and draped bodice. Are all these things enough to raise the dress above the usual 1840s bland curse?  Or would this dress be just another wallflower? Rate the Dress …