Latest Posts

The HSM 2017: Challenge #2 Re-make, Re-use, Re-fashion

2017 is the fifth year of the  Historical Sew Monthly, and to commemorate, many  of this years challenges are repeats of some of the most popular challenges from the first four years.

February’s challenge,  Re-make, Re-use & Re-fashion, definitely deserves its place as the first repeat of the year, both for its popularity the first time it ran, and for how important it is as a historical concept.  Until very recently, and in every period covered by the Historical Sew Monthly,  fabric and materials were very expensive, and people got as much use out of them as possible.

The challenge asks us to ‘make something that pays homage to the historical idea of re-using, re-making and re-fashioning.  Turn one thing into another.  Re-fit or re-fashion an old gown into something you would wear again.  Re-trim a hat for a new outfit, or re-shape a modern hat to be a historical hat.  Re-purpose the fabric from an old garment (your own or a commercial one) into a new garment.’

Fabric re-use is a very common type of re-making, re-using and re-fashioning.  Many, many 18th century gowns in museum collections show evidence of re-making.

There are numerous examples of gowns made from 18th century fabric that were re-made a number of times in the 18th century, and then re-made again in the mid-19th century,  a hundred years after the fabric was first woven.

One of my favourite examples of 18th to 19th c re-use is this ca 1880 dress with an under-skirt fashioned  from an 18th c quilted petticoat.

My most recent Rate the Dress post is another example of 18th-to-19th century re-use: an 1820s dress made from mid-18th century fabric.

Garments were re-made from more contemporary fabric throughout the 19th century as well, just as they had been in the 18th century.  They aren’t as obvious and common as their 18th century counterparts, in part because many fashionable 19th century fabrics weren’t as durable, and in part because the innovations of the industrial revolution made fabrics cheaper, and fashions change more quickly, so garments tended to be re-made after only a few years, meaning that the difference between the fabric’s creation date and the garment’s style is not so obvious.

Louisa May Alcott’s ‘An Old Fashioned Girl’ has an entire chapter devoted to describing how poor minister’s daughter Polly helps previously rich Fanny to make a new spring wardrobe out of her worn out garments from past seasons.

A ‘grey street suit, faded past cure’ is turned wrong side out to show ‘clean, bright fabric’, which, with ‘fresh trimming and less of it will finish you off as smart as ever’.  Fanny has never worn a turned dress in her life: but clearly knows it’s a common enough practice for those with a little less money.  Polly cheerfully admits ‘I’ve worn turned and dyed gowns all my days’.

‘Two draggled skirts and a stained waist’ are ‘transformed into a whole rig’ through clever re-use which takes advantage of the change in fashions ‘Gores is out, and plaits is in; therefore, as the top of this skirt is quite fresh, we will take off the ruffles, turn it upside down, and leave it plain.  The upper skirt will be made scanter, and finished with a frill.  Then the waist can be refreshed with the best part of these wide flounces, and out of those new bits we will concoct a hat.’

Hats also came into their own for re-furbishement.  Polly asseses Fanny’s old hat collection and predicts that with a bit of ripping and re-trimming  ‘out of three old ones we’ll get a pretty new ones’

This type of re-fashioning and re-trimming continued into the 20th century.  I posted this article on trimming hats with  old silk stockings from Feb 1928.
The Women's Magazine, Feb 1928 thedreamstress.com

While it’s hard to identify many19th century re-fashions in museum collections, one common one  is re-made Kashmiri shawls.  The fabric is distinctive, durable, valuable, and datable, so it’s quite easy to see all the ways in which it was refashioned into garments, such as in this tea gown:

And this gentlemen’s dressing gown:

Gentlemen's Paisley Wool Dressing Gown. English, c. 1875, fotki.yandex.ru

Gentlemen’s Paisley Wool Dressing Gown. English, c. 1875, fotki.yandex.ru

Kashmiri shawls are also an excellent example of historical re-fashioning: taking an item that was meant for one thing, and re-using it for another. Early shawls were woven in Kashmiri as discrete garments, but European fashionistas also used them as fabric lengths which could be sewn up into garments.

Fashion plate featuring a dress made of Kashmiri shawls, 1812

Fashion plate featuring a dress made of Kashmiri shawls, 1812

Re-fashioning is extremely common  in the historical costuming community.  The exact materials and items to make period items often no longer exist, so we have to make do.  We re-shape  modern hats into historical shapes, hack shoes to be as close to period originals as possible, re-fashion paint stirrers as  busks for stays.

I love historical accuracy, but I also love re-fashioning for practical reasons.  I’ve shown you hot to turn a cheap modern fedora into a 1920s style cloche, and a straw sunhat into an 18th c. bergere style hat.  I’ve turned 1990s heels into 1870s shoes, 1980s sinamay race hats into 1920s garden party hats, vintage tablecloths into 1900s blouses, sheets into petticoats, and lots more!  While all of these were practical, some also manage perfect accuracy: as we re-make and re-fashion, we’re continuing on a grand tradition, which probably goes back beyond written records of garments.

I can’t wait to see what everyone else adds to the tradition!

Scroop Miramar Prep thedreamstress.com5

A preppy Scroop Miramar

It’s summer here in NZ,  and that means breaking out the knits and lightweight cottons and rayons, and making a bunch of Miramars & Henrietta Marias.

The Miramar Dress, Top & Tunic

I’ve always wanted a sky blue Miramar, but couldn’t find the right fabric last year.  At the end of spring I finally found some fabulous pique knit in the perfect sky blue, and whipped up a Miramar that very night.

Scroop Miramar Prep thedreamstress.com

I love the pique knit: it’s polo shirt fabric, so, combined with the colour, the Miramar feels very preppy.  I feel like I ought to be wearing it with a grosgrain belt and driving mocs  (sans socks, natch).

Scroop Miramar Prep thedreamstress.com

Since I don’t have either of those (I guess I have lots of grosgrain, and belt findings, so could have made one!) I paired it with my clamdigging shorts (suitably preppy name, and eminently practical for the occasion), my favourite sunnies, and bare feet.

Scroop Miramar Prep thedreamstress.com

I did actually wear shoes for most of the outfit’s outing.   I was wearing this for a walk through the Karori Cemetary with the Wellington Sewing bloggers, visiting the graves of the Penguin victims (no, NZ doesn’t have killer penguins.  A ferry  named the Penguin went down near Wellington on 12 Feb 1909, and 75 of the 105 people on-board, including all of the children, and all but one woman, perished).

After the walk we had an impromptu picnic with supplies from the local Four Square, and Nina helped me get  photos of my outfit.

 

Scroop Miramar Prep thedreamstress.com

Not the most exciting sew, but fun and easy, and great for a walk and a picnic with friends!

Scroop Miramar Prep thedreamstress.com

 

Rate the Dress: a Romantic-era recycle mystery dress

Last weeks blue-grey and white late 1870s dress was one of my favourite kinds of Rate the Dresses: one that sparks lots of interesting discussion, quite strong feelings, and hilarious comparisons (personally, I think anything that can be described as Victorian Dalek fancy dress should automatically be  a 10 😉 ).  The feelings, while strong, were very mixed – a solid block of very high ratings, an equally solid block of very low ratings, and a lot people who thought it was, ummm…interesting.  Personally I give it an intellectual 10 and an aesthetic 6, but your ratings evened out at 6.3 out of 10 – I guess the aggregate rating was closer to my aesthetic reaction than my intellectual reaction!

This week we’re rating a dress has done the rounds on pinterest, but where I unfortunately can’t find the original source.  I generally try not to post Rate the Dresses if I can’t credit the collection, but occasionally breaking that rule, and asking for your help in finding the source, is a good way to locate it and make it easier for future searchers to find it.

The only clue I have is that the dress probably comes from a European collection, possibly Czech.  Do you know where it’s from?  (confession: I’ve spent all day on the phone with Applecare and Adobe, fixing issues arising from my hard-drive crash, and I’ve hit the point where I can’t do even the most basic tech thing, so you may find if very easy to figure out where this is from!).

UPDATE:  Many thanks to Daniel for locating the collection!

As there is no source for this dress, I don’t have a lot of information on it, but I can guess a bit by looking at it.  The silhouette and combination of historical and military inspired trims place the dress ca. 1820, but the fabric is not contemporary with the dress.  This appears to be a fantastic example of a 19th century garment made from mid-18th century fabric.

The skirt is cut into panels to create the slight cone shape fashionable in the 1820s, but the wide serpentine stripes of the the fabric were originally intended for a garment that used full widths of rectangular fabric, so the angled panels create an interesting pattern of disappearing stripes.

Personally, I quite like the symmetry of the mannequin being as blank as the dresses background: you cannot rate it on anything but the dress itself.

So how does the dress alone fare?

Rate the Dress on a Scale of 1 to 10