Latest Posts

Five for Friday: Television shows that I love (that may surprise you)

Last week I shared five TV shows that people often assume I will love, but where I really don’t.  This week, here are 5 TV shows that I love, some of which may really surprise you (and the rest totally won’t, but there are only 5 TV shows I really wanted to talk about).  They are arranged in order of how unexpected my love of them is.

1. Hunting Aotearoa

Yes, really.  It’s a reality TV show about hunting, and I love it.  And it isn’t even in English (well, it slides in and out of English & Te Reo Maori all the time), and Mr D loves it (Mr D hates foreign language films).  We sit there every week, tuned to Maori TV, watching people shoot animals and carry carcasses around, and we coo about how sweet it is.

Because it is sweet.  It’s not really about the shooting, and it certainly isn’t about being macho and killing things.  It’s about local communities, and families, and really down-to-earth, ordinary people who are supplementing their diet with local game.  The presenters are very low-key, the people they meet are lovely people you would want to meet and know yourself, and stewardship and caring for the land are major elements of the show.

Also, best of all (and I just found this out), they filmed a few episodes on Moloka’i, hunting with a dear friend of my parents!  I found out when he gave Mum some venison and I told him about how I loved to watch a hunting show – and he said “Oh, Hunting Aotearoa, I’ve been on it”.  What a small world it is!

Feral goat on Moloka’i – or why I’m such a fan of hunting

2. King of the Hill

I meet all these people who hate King of the Hill for its animation, or think it is stupid.  I can see the first as a valid criticism, but I just can’t agree with the second.  A few of the episodes are a bit blunt, some perhaps even dumb, but some of them are so, so brilliant.  There is an episode where Hank Hill says something along the lines of “They don’t make statues of people who keep their lawns mowed and pick up their rubbish, but that doesn’t mean we aren’t heros.”  And it’s totally true.  King of the Hill is a show about small heros – about people who have flaws and foolishnesses, but are ultimately good, and generally come back to being good, even when they are tempted to be briefly bad.  Also, the episode where Hank joins a food co-op and owns an organic cow is just fantastic.

Granted, with all that said, I haven’t watched an episode since the series ended – it was good while it lasted, but I don’t feel the need to see re-runs.

3. My Name is Earl

OK, yes, it’s often crude, and sometimes dumb.  It’s also really, really sweet.  If being dumb and crude at points is what it takes for a show about being a better person to survive on TV, well, it’s a start.

4. Firefly

Well, no surprise here!  Also, so much awesomeness I don’t really need to tell you about it, right?

5. Doctor Who

OK, yeah.  This one is also probably surprising no one!  But it is my favourite TV show (marginally outstripping Firefly), and for many of the same reasons as the other shows I like: it’s about being a good person, often in the face of terrible odds.  I can’t count the number of episodes where the Doctor offers the villains every possible option to do good and find a way out, or the episodes where mercy prevails over violence and evil, or where there is no evil at all – just the struggle within ourselves.  Moffat seems to be taking the show in a slightly different direction – I really hope it doesn’t go too far.

Since you may wonder, the lack of historical accuracy in Doctor Who doesn’t bug me at all – it’s fantasy, and they never claim to be accurate.  Also, the thought of the British monarchy being werewolves never fails to amuse me.

I tried to introduce my parents to the Whoniverse during my visit home, but the library system and the postal service conspired against us, and I couldn’t get any in on time.  They’ll just have to wade in without me.

 

Hmmmm…only two of these shows are still on the air.  I guess it’s because I don’t like a lot of TV – so it takes a long time to accumulate a list of 5!  If there was a 6th, it would be MASH.

UPDATE:

OK, so it doesn’t pay to write posts at midnight, while travelling and sleep deprived, because I totally forgot about the show that I meant to put as #2, which is  Top Gear (the original UK version, never seen the US version).

Yes, it’s a show about cars, hosted mainly by the biggest jerk petrolhead ever.  Yeah, my usually car knowledge is limited to “What kind of car is our car? Ummmm…it’s green?” and “What kind of car do I want? The one that looks like a frog!”, but Top Gear can be hilarious. Mr D and I just about died laughing at the episode where they made alternative limousines, and the Big Mac truck episode was pretty good too.  Anything that makes Mr D & I scream with laughter is a good thing.

On the bright side, the show I would have bumped off the list to include Top Gear is Firefly, and since some of you are saying you’ve never seen it, anything that encourages you to see it is a good thing!

 

Rate the Dress: Green tartan in 1801

UPDATE: Last week’s Worth of 1875 rated a (drumroll here because it is 5 months late and better be worth it!) 8.5 out of 10.  Many of you were madly in love with it, but a few of you thought the colours and trim a bit disjointed, and it lost points for that.

This is my last week of ‘away’ Rate the Dresses where I haven’t had time to look at all your comments from last week.  Hopefully I’ve picked a good one!

I’ve been very good and have resisted the urge to show you this as a St Patricks themed post in March, with some dreadful comment about mixing Scotland and Ireland.

Instead I’m showing you this now because…ummm…green is good….plaid is good…Hawai’i is very green…also, it’s interesting (the Rate the Dress, not Hawai’i, though Hawai’i is interesting too).

Fashion plate featuring afternoon dress, February 1801, LACMA

While tartan is one of the ‘universal’ patterns (like the Meander, or Greek Key) that turns up in almost every culture, rather than the exclusively Scottish design it is sometimes thought of as, this dress, with its tartan over-robe and be-feathered tam o’ shanter (granted, Scotch bonnets probably weren’t called that yet – Burn’s poem having been published only a decade before) inspired hat, was almost certainly meant to evoke a bit of Highland flair.

What do you think of the puffed-sleeve white dress, cross-front over robe of green tartan (what fabric do you suppose the tartan was?) cross and bead necklace (the beads look like carnelian, or coral perhaps), yellow gloves (they were clearly quite the thing for the Regency lady), and distinctive headdress? Does it have flair or failure written all over it (in large green checks).

(also, how many more side notes do you suppose I can squeeze into this post?)

Rate the Dress on a Scale of 1 to 10.

 

Terminology: What is bagheera? (and a bonus definition)

Bagheera is fine, uncut pile velvet.  It was originally made of silk, but after the introduction of cellulose fabrics it could be made of rayon.  It was popular in the 1930s & 40s.

A 1933 fashion column describes it as ‘a crepe velvet with a matte surface’.  The ‘matte surface’ refers to the rough, uncut pile which absorbs rather than reflecting light.

The crepe makes it crush-resistant, and gives it a lovely drape, making it very popular for evening wear.  Heavier bagheeras are also used in furnishing, because the crush-resistant quality makes it suitable for chairs and other items that get heavy wear.

Bagheera is first used as a term for the particular type of velvet in the early 30s, and mentions in the early ’30s sometimes use quotation marks, indicating it was a novel term.   It was used for evening dresses and skirts, glamourous house-robes (the replacement for the tea gown), as an alternative to fur for wraps and jackets, and in millinery.

Bagheera remained popular into the early ’40s, but was another textile that disappeared with the social changes of WWII.

“Clever new tricorn of black felt faced with mustard yellow bagheera” Alto Herald, April 1942 Via Texas History

It’s not evident if bagheera the velvet has any link to Kipling’s Bagheera, the panther in the Jungle Book.  The books almost certainly predate the use of the term for a velvet, and it may be that the fabric was named after the books, either to evoke a sense of exoticism (hmmm…never seen that before!) or because the rough pile of the velvet reminded someone of a panthers coat.

Unfortunately, while I can find mentions of bagheera, and definitions of the fabric, I’ve been unable to find a reasonable image of the fabric itself!  If you have one, or another period image featuring bagheera, or (the holy grail) an image of a period garment made of bagheera, please share!

And a bit of bonus terminology:

What is uncut velvet?  An uncut velvet is a velvet where the pile threads are left as loops (like toweling and terrycloth) rather than being trimmed into discreet strands).  It is sometimes called terry velvet.

Source:

O’Hara, Georgina,  The Encyclopedia of Fashion: From 1840 to the 1980s.  London: Thames and Hudson Ltd.  1986

Datta, R.K., The Global Silk Industry: A Complete Source Book.  Delhi: APH Publishing.  2007