Latest Posts

Friday Review: Fitzroy Gardens & Cooks Cottage

While I was in Melbourne I stayed just a few blocks from the famous Fitzroy Gardens, and everyone told me that I simply must go visit Cooks’ Cottage “where Captain Cook was born.”

Cooks’ Cottage, Fitzroy Gardens, Australia

Exciting!  An 18th century house in Australia, and one so closely linked to one of the most famous and influential explorers ever.

A life-size statue of the very tall (over 6 feet) James Cook

Wait, what?

Captain Cook wasn’t born in Australia!

And there weren’t European settlements in Australia until the 1780s!  How could there be a proper stone cottage from 1750?

The answer is sad and prosaic.

The cottage was built in 1750, but not in its current location.  It was built by Cook’s parents in England, sold in the 1930s, bought by a wealthy Australian, transported stone by stone to Melbourne, and re-assembled.

18th century stones – 20th century setting

So really, it’s only kinda an 18th century cottage.

Darn.

And the news gets worse.

Despite what everyone in Melbourne (with the exception of the cottage staff) will tell you, Captain Cook wasn’t born in the cottage.  It was built by his parents, but it was built when he was TWENTY SIX!  Yeah.  It’s very doubtful he ever lived in it – more likely he just visited.

A bedroom that James Cook may have slept in (and some not even remotely 18th century clothes)

Well, boo.

Steep, narrow 18th century stairs

In fact, the closest the cottage really gets to Cook’s birth is a fragment of the column from the church he was baptised in in Merton, England.

Column head from the church at Merton

Still, original or not it is the oldest building in Australia, and one of the few 18th century buildings I have ever seen (I really must get to Europe!).

The cottage is also fascinating in that it is a labourer’s house – Cook’s parents were simple farm workers, so even with 20th century plastering and a mish-mash of furniture, you got a clear sense of how ordinary people lived.  The rooms are tiny, the staircase steep and narrow, the windows small.

The larger bedroom

The cottage was sort-of furnished, but I’m not enough of an expert on 18th century furniture and house fittings to confirm if they were accurate or not.

Furniture and fittings in the large downstairs room

I can confirm that sadly, all the textiles associated with the cottage are not accurate.  The visitors stopping through did seem to really enjoy the dress up box with its shiny white wigs and 1970s crocheted shawls, and that’s how my enthusiasm for costuming started as a young girl, so full points for that.

Furniture, textile stuff, and a window overlooking the garden in the larger bedroom

To be perfectly honest, the inaccurate textiles didn’t bug me – you wouldn’t want real 18th century textiles on display in open rooms with harsh antipoedean sunshine.  What did bug me was this:

The stick-your-face in an 18th century picture thingee

It’s based on a photograph of a pretend 18th century family in one of the cottage’s educational displays.  The photograph is well…unfortunate…but if you are going to do a painting you can make anything up, so they could have at least drawn people in somewhat accurate and plausible garments.  Even just garments that fit.  Gah!

Ok. So that made me grumpy.

What made me happy was the garden – a reproduction 18th century cottage garden.  Some of the labels referred more to 19th century flower symbology than 18th century concepts, but the plants were lovely, and the garden was suitably focused on food and health, and properly untidy.

The view of the house from the garden, with the statue and the dress up garments

Other good stuff:

The price.  At $5 the entry fee properly balanced funding the house and being accessible to a reasonable range of people.  It certainly seemed popular – there was a steady stream of visitors, mostly families with children,

And the staff were great – lovely and friendly and enthusiastic about their work.  They were certainly excited about getting a visitor from Hawaii.

The entry, with an 18th century stone doormat and a mounting stone

The verdict?  A charming place to visit, particularly suited for families and children.

Terminology: What is chinchilla

I’m not much for fur, but chinchilla has always fascinated me.  I think it is the name.  It’s just so darn cute!  It sounds like a name Disney would invent for an animal.

I’m never really thought about what a chinchilla actually was until recently.  When I did begin to wonder, I had to look it up.

The chinchilla is a rodent from South America.  It looks like this:

Chinchilla via Wikimedia Commons

OH.MY.GOODNESS

Squeee!

Cute overload.

It’s a fat little mouse with extra big ears and a squirrel tail!

Awwwwwwwwwwwwwww!

I think they were invented by Disney!

Really, could you get any cuter if you tried?

I think we need to see more cuteness:

Chinchilla mom and baby via Fanpop

Awwwwwwwwwww!

Of course, in fashion they aren’t concerned with how gosh darn cute the fat little mice with big ears and fluffy squirrel tails are.  They are concerned with how soft and dense the fur is, because they kill and skin those gosh darn cute fat little big-eared, fluffy-tailed mice for it.

Natural chinchilla fur is pale grey with a dark streak running along the tail, and incredibly soft and plush, because each hair follicle sprouts an average of 8 hairs.  It is so soft and dense that chinchillas should not get wet – their thick hair traps the moisture, and they develop mold and skin rot.

Accessory Set Princeton Process, Inc. Manufacturer- The Brothers Christie Fur Corp.,1974, chinchilla fur, Metropolitan Museum of Art

The fur is so lovely that 16th century Spanish explorers in South America immediately noted the possibilities of the fur and started the fashion for it.  Chinchilla went in and out of fashion over the next three centuries, and saw its greatest craze in the 2nd half of the 19th century, where cloaks and mantles were lavishly lined and trimmed in it.

The Countess de Castiglione by Pierre-Louis Pierson, 1862—67, Metropolitan Museum of Art "The Countess is shown here dressed in the latest fashion for the winter season of 1862-3. She wears a coatdress of lilac velvet, edged in red velvet cut into dents and a cloak edged with chinchilla. Her white bonnet is tied with red and white double strings, and she holds a chinchilla muff."

It was so popular that over-hunting caused the extinction of one species of chinchilla and the other species were both very rare by the end of the Victorian era.  Chinchilla were so rare that the death of the only known chinchilla in North America in 1908 made international news.

A Chinchilla and Sable Toque, Auckland Star, 13 June 1896, Via Papers Past

The rarity led to the early 20th century development of the Chinchilla rabbit in France as a cheaper, more widely available, imitation chinchilla fur.  It also had the benefit of being a meat species.  The chinchilla rabbit, combined with the scarcity of the chinchilla, led to a rapid drop in the export of chinchilla fur from South America – 20,000 furs were exported from Chile in 1900, only 150 in 1925.

The drop in chinchilla exports certainly wasn’t because chinchilla was no longer fashionable.  1925 saw another peak in the chinchilla craze, with those who could afford it draping themselves in loose coats trimmed in chinchilla fur.

Evening coat of ermine with chinchilla trim by Jay-Thorpe, Inc., ca. 1925, American, Metropolitan Museum of Art

Notice how the coat above is ermine trimmed in chinchilla?  That’s because real chinchilla was the most expensive and exclusive fur available in the 1930s.    Those who had less resources had to content themselves with chinchilla rabbit.   It wasn’t until 1929 that the popularity of chinchilla, real and rabbit (and all other furs) declined slightly.  It’s return was hailed periodically throughout the 1930s as a sign that the depression was over, but both the end of economic hard times, and the return of chinchilla, were wishful thinking on the part of fashion editors.

Auckland Evening Post, 3 January 1925, Coat with collar and cuffs in Chinchilla

Today it is illegal to hunt wild chinchilla, and chinchilla fur for the fashion industry is farmed.  The popularity of chinchilla has been in steady decline since 1930.  There was a brief revival in the 1970s, but people have been less inclined to wear fur in general.  Today chinchillas are often pets rather than fashion accessories.

Woman's coat of wool paisley shawl and chinchilla fur, Designed by Arnold Scaasi, 1972, MFA Boston

Anyone ever had a chinchilla or interacted with one as a pet?  What are they like?

Sources:

O’Hara, Georgina,  The Encyclopedia of Fashion: From 1840 to the 1980s.  London: Thames and Hudson Ltd.  1986

Open sewing*

Do you ever get stuck with your sewing?

Just get to a place where you can’t figure out how to set in those sleeves, or why the waist just won’t sit right, or how to do bound buttonholes or a side zip?

Or you’re trying to turn a design into a reality, and can’t figure out how many gores the skirt should have (or should you cut it as a circle?), or if the jacket needs flat lining or not, or if it will work in a tissue, or if you really should buy a crepe chiffon after all?

I do this all the time.  It used to be about not knowing the techniques, but now it’s about knowing too much – getting stuck in my head because there are so many options.

The Waterlily dress, circa 2002

The solution to this is a sewing community.  These days I am indebted to you, dear readers, to local sewing friends like Mrs C and the Baha’i seamstresses, to the fashion experts at Massey university, and to wider sewing-blogging friends like Steph.  They let me bounce ideas off them, and bounce ideas in return, and we share tips and tricks and all learn from each other.  And that’s fabulous.

Most often though, I still go back to my original sewing resources – to the amazing drapers and tailors and seamstresses that all worked, at one time or another, in a little costume shop in Oakland California, and to the wonderful sewers and textile lovers I grew up with in Hawaii.

Mid-Victorian capes & jackets & bonnets, 2004

I was so privileged with my early sewing, and my ‘real’ in-depth training during university, to have such a great group of people to draw on, and to teach me.  I think the most important thing that shaped my sewing, and my ability to create, is that I quickly got to move beyond basic classes to doing my own thing. I got to work on whatever I was interested in, but every time I got stuck, there was someone there to look at it, to make suggestions, to provide resources and inspiration.

That, really, is what has made me as a seamstress, and has given me the confidence to try things, to go way beyond basic patterns and sewing standards.  And that’s fabulous.

The 'Gilded Lily', circa 2004

I think this sort of training and support is so important.  It doesn’t matter what level your sewing is – having someone to help and teach you outside of a really formal sewing class is invaluable.

This is why I’m offering ‘Open Sewing‘ as one of my sessions at Made Marion.

It’s a time for any sewer, of any level, to have me at their disposal for whatever project they are working on.

I’m hoping for absolute beginners who just want to learn at their own pace, and with the patterns and ideas that interest them most, for very advanced sewers working on elaborate tailored jackets, for crazy costumers doing historical garments and fantastical engineered things.  It gives me a space to teach things that there isn’t enough demand for to do an entire class on, but which someone wants to learn.

What do you think?  How did you learn to sew?  Formal classes?  A family member?  Self taught from books and the internet?  How did you make the jump from set patterns and simply following instructions to making whatever you could imagine?  Are you still waiting to take that jump?

And (most exciting of all!), have some of you already lined up the projects you are bringing to get me to help with?

'Marina' circa 2004

*this post is illustrated with photos of my early-ish sewing that are only tangentially related to the post, but which I thought you might find fun.