Five for Friday: my least favourite ‘historical’ phrases
1. ‘Vintage‘ for anything pre-21st century. I’m sorry, I don’t care what etsy says, 1993 is NOT ‘vintage’. I sewed clothes that I can still wear in 1993. I’m pretty sure I’m not old enough to be vintage. Even if it’s 1960s it’s NOT vintage, it’s retro. Equally, nothing post 1920 is ‘antique‘, it’s just vintage. And you know what, there is a really good reason to have these classifications. They make life easier. It really sucks to be searching for vintage 1930s patterns and having to slog through pages and pages of 1980s blouses and 1960s mod dresses. There is nothing wrong with retro items – retro is a wonderful classification. Some of my favourite things are retro. But they aren’t vintage! So do the world a favour and don’t call anything made after 1920 ‘antique, anything made after 1959 ‘vintage’ (personally, I think it should be ’55), and don’t call anything made after 1990 ‘retro’. 2. Back in the day.’ Back in what day? Back in the day… 3. In olden times‘ Which …