Latest Posts

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

The 1790s Tiny Piney Dress

When you’re a historical costumer going to Europe, obviously you have to take at least one costume for dressing up in front of castles in!

But…luggage allowances…

So, what’s the historical period with the combination of prettiest clothes and least heavy layers?

1790s!

Back in 2020, at the end of New Zealand’s first lockdown, I found an amazing ramie-cotton blend fabric with an adorable pineapple print on it:

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.comThe print is not accurate of course.  However, it is perfectly in keeping with the late 18th and early 19th century obsession with pineapples, and it’s so tiny that from even a slight distance away it looks like a plaid or geometric print.

The fabric is also not accurate, but is a feel and type of fabric that seamstresses of the era would have recognised.  Ramie like this (made from Boehmeria nivea from Asia) was unlikely to have been used in the 18th century, but European nettle cloth (from Urtica dioica) was widely used in Europe until the late 19th century.  It can be difficult to tell nettle cloth apart from linen once woven, so some items identified as linen in museum collections are likely to be nettle cloth.

Very helpfully for travelling, the fabric is extremely lightweight, not prone to creasing, and not so see through that it needs lots of layers.  Most importantly, the fabric makes me happy!

For the pattern I settled on a mash up of this dress:

Dress of tambour embroidered cotton, ca. 1795, featured in the Dress for Excess' Exhibition at Brighton's Royal Pavilion, Sussex, Britain - 05 Jan 2011

Dress of tambour embroidered cotton, ca. 1795, featured in the Dress for Excess’ Exhibition at Brighton’s Royal Pavilion, Sussex, Britain – opened 05 Jan 2011

And this fashion plate (yes, that’s a pineapple on the turban!):

Journal des Luxus und der Moden, September 1797

Journal des Luxus und der Moden, September 1797

I also heavily referenced the famous ca. 1797 wedding dress from the National Museum in Denmark (often called the Tidens Toj dress), and looked at 1790s dresses in Patterns of Fashion and The Cut of Women’s Clothes for more guidance on the cut of the sleeves and bodice, and accurate skirt widths.

With help from my wonderful sewing friends (and, of course, Felicity), I developed a pattern, fitted a bodice toile, and began sewing.

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com First the lining goes together:

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

Then the outer fabric gets applied:

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

And then sleeves get sewn:

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

And inserted in to the under-armscythe:

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

And pleated over the strap:

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

And then I sewed a channel for the front skirt drawstring:

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

And made lots and lots of tiny pleats in the back of the skirt:

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

And then basted them all in place.  It’s ALWAYS worth the time to baste things in place, because it means you get the final sewing right, and when you don’t get it right, you can unpick and re-adjust without things moving about.

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

Did I mention unpicking?

Yeah…

I whipped the skirt on to the bodice while flying from Wellington to Sydney:

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

From Sydney to Dubai I finished interior skirt seams and hemmed:

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

And then I got to Sweden and tried on the dress with Elisa’s (@isiswardrobe) help, and realised the way the waistline dipped down under the arms and then raised back up again wasn’t right:

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

The white areas are places where I had to piece in scraps of fabric.  There is SO MUCH piecing under the arms of this dress.  I don’t have a scrap of fabric bigger than 2cm x3cm left!

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

So I unpicked, adjusted the bodice end line, and re-set the skirt.  Three times…

But at least I had the most gorgeous sewing spot in the world to do it in!

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

Seriously!!!

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

And finally, finally, it was done!

I got to wear it at Kina Slott at Drottningholm in Sweden:

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

And at two different locations in Czechia:

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

1790s Tiny Piney dress thedreamstress.com

And I’ll be blogging about all those places in due course!

There’s a few things I’d change about the dress if I made it again (as there is with almost everything I make except Scroop Patterns, which I test so obsessively), but it’s fun to wear and was easy to carry around Europe.

Rate the Dress: 1920’s velvet

This week’s Rate the Dress is a little delayed because I was busy with all the exciting stuff for the Persis Corset launch, and then the even more exciting stuff where I trotted around Europe for a month.

Last Rate the Dress: a 1906-9 formal day dress in warp printed silk

You were mostly very enthusiastic about last week’s Edwardian day dress, although a few of you thought it was far too curtain-y, and not everyone was on board with the silhouette.

The Total: 8.7 out of 10

Those who didn’t like it found it quite mediocre, but enough of you loved it to keep the rating at a very impressive 8.7!

This week: a 1920’s evening dress in dark teal silk velvet

This week’s Rate the Dress pick is inspired by the Baltic Sea.  I’m fascinated by how different the colour of the Baltic is to the Pacific and Abel Tasman seas that I’m used to: so green to their azure.  The teal velvet is admittedly brighter than I have seen the Baltic be, but its greenish hue is in the right family.

Evening dress, late 1920s, silk velvet, gold lamé, flattened silver cord, crystal bugle beads, silk floss embroidery, lamé underdress, McAvoy, Chicago, sold by Augusta Auctions

Evening dress, late 1920s, silk velvet, gold lamé, flattened silver cord, crystal bugle beads, silk floss embroidery, lamé underdress, McAvoy, Chicago, sold by Augusta Auctions

The dress features a gold lame underdress, with a wrap effect overdress with a bow on one hip, and and embroidered and beaded ornament with drapery on the other.

Evening dress, late 1920s, silk velvet, gold lamé, flattened silver cord, crystal bugle beads, silk floss embroidery, lamé underdress, McAvoy, Chicago, sold by Augusta Auctions

Evening dress, late 1920s, silk velvet, gold lamé, flattened silver cord, crystal bugle beads, silk floss embroidery, lamé underdress, McAvoy, Chicago, sold by Augusta Auctions

It strikes me that the overdress bodice, with its V neck and open sides, has elements in common with some red carpet trends at the moment.  I can’t count how many red carpet and wedding dresses I’ve seen in the last year with open or illusion sides.  Of course, in modern dresses the open sides and neck reveal flesh, or at least pretend to, while this one reveals a rather chaste lamé underdress!

Evening dress, late 1920s, silk velvet, gold lamé, flattened silver cord, crystal bugle beads, silk floss embroidery, lamé underdress, McAvoy, Chicago, sold by Augusta Auctions

Evening dress, late 1920s, silk velvet, gold lamé, flattened silver cord, crystal bugle beads, silk floss embroidery, lamé underdress, McAvoy, Chicago, sold by Augusta Auctions

I do rather like the idea of the metallic underdress as armour – a soft luxurious slip of velvet, like a 1920s tabard, over beaten steel and chain mail.

Evening dress, late 1920s, silk velvet, gold lamé, flattened silver cord, crystal bugle beads, silk floss embroidery, lamé underdress, McAvoy, Chicago, sold by Augusta Auctions

Of course, that’s probably not at all what the dress designer was going for, and the ornamentation on the dress isn’t remotely medieval.  Sometimes the decorations on 1920s dresses have clear historical inspiration, but this one seems to be a more generic stylised flower:

Evening dress, late 1920s, silk velvet, gold lamé, flattened silver cord, crystal bugle beads, silk floss embroidery, lamé underdress, McAvoy, Chicago, sold by Augusta Auctions

Evening dress, late 1920s, silk velvet, gold lamé, flattened silver cord, crystal bugle beads, silk floss embroidery, lamé underdress, McAvoy, Chicago, sold by Augusta Auctions

What do you think?  Classic 1920s at its best, or generic 1920s, and thus unmemorable?

Rate the Dress on a Scale of 1 to 10

A reminder about rating — feel free to be critical if you don’t like a thing, but make sure that your comments aren’t actually insulting to those who do like a garment.  Phrase criticism as your opinion, rather than a flat fact. Our different tastes are what make Rate the Dress so interesting.  It’s no fun when a comment implies that anyone who doesn’t agree with it, or who would wear a garment, is totally lacking in taste.

As usual, nothing more complicated than a .5.  I also hugely appreciate it if you only do one rating, and set it on a line at the very end of your comment.

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

The Vasa: the 17th c ship that sailed 1300m and sank

There were so many amazing things to see in Stockholm, but definitely one of the highlights was my trip to the Vasamuseet: the museum that houses the only almost-intact salvaged 17th c ship in the world.

The Vasa was built between 1626-1628 under the orders of Gustavus Adolphus.  It was intended to serve the Swedish navy in the wars against Poland-Lithuania, which turned Sweden into a European superpower in the 17th century.

While the wars may have been very successful for Sweden, and while Gustavus Adolphus is recognised as a military genius and “the father of modern warfare”, the Vasa was notoriously not successful, partly because of Gustavus Adolphus’ insistence that it be built in a hurry and launched on his schedule.

The idea behind the Vasa was brilliant:  Gustavus Adolphus correctly predicted that naval warfare was going to transition from a strategy based on damaging a ship enough to board it (the technique made famous by pirate movies) to one based on hitting ships with enough cannons to sink or totally incapacitate them.  So he ordered a ship with two layers of gun decks, and 72 new guns for them.

There were just a few not-so-small problems…

First, the shipbuilders contracted for the ship had almost certainly never built ships with two gun decks.  Building a 17th c style gunship with enough ballast to balance the weight of the guns is very tricky.  Then the primary shipbuilder got sick and was incapacitated shortly after the build began.  Then the king began ordering a very tight build time for the ship, to compensate for ships lost in battle.  Some of the ship builders were dubious, and there were murmurs that the fancy new ship was not sea worthy, but no one dared tell the king.  Then some of the special guns weren’t even done in time for the launch.  That may actually have been a good thing for the Swedish navy, because…

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

The Vasa launched with great fanfare on 10 August 1628.  With a ship crowded with crew and visitors (crew were allowed to take family and friends on the initial part of the voyage) it sailed past waterfronts crammed with ordinary people, royals, and visiting dignitaries.  All her gun ports were open to send out a salute as the ship left Stockholm.

Less than 1,000 meters into her voyage the first small gust of wind hit, and the top-heavy, too-narrow ship heeled sharply to port.  The sailors struggled to right her, but managed to.  Only a few meters further on a slightly bigger gust of wind hit, and the ship keeled over.  The open gun ports flooded, and within minutes the ship sank 30 meters to the bottom of the harbour.

Boats rushed out to rescue the survivors who were clinging to the masts above water, or floating.  Amazingly, of the 300ish people who were on board, only 30-50 died, most because they were trapped below deck or hit by debris.

After an initial failed attempt to raise the ship, the Vasa sat on the bottom of the harbour for over 300 years.  Most of her extremely valuable guns were salvaged in the 1660s in a terrifying procedure involving men standing in primitive iron diving bells being lowered down 20-25 meters where they fished blind for cannons with huge grappling hooks.  The English ambassador to Sweden described how the leather-clad ‘divers’ were pulled up after 20 minutes, blue and shivering with cold.

And then, in the 1950s, amateur archeologist Anders Franzén realised the brackish waters of the Baltic sea would have preserved the Vasa against shipworm, and set out to find it.  He succeeded, and the Vasa was dug up from the seabed and raised in a process that sounds almost as terrifying as what the 17th century ‘divers’ did.  Imagine crawling 20 m down a narrow tunnel in the mud UNDER a shipwreck in this to dig out more tunnel so that a cable could be passed under the ship:

A diorama of how the Vasa was raised:

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

Apparently a number of wild methods were proposed for raising the Vasa, including filling it with ping pong balls and freezing it in a giant icecube.  When I read about this and told Elisa she pondered “How would they do that?”  And I joked “One at a time”, leading to great merriment from both of us as we’d been musing about different methods.  I was fully imagining divers in the suits above carefully clutching one solitary ping pong in their hand, descending, popping it in the ship and coming back up 🤣

Anyway, on to ALL the photos of the preserved ship.  They don’t begin to capture how enormous or amazing it is, but will hopefully encourage you to read more about it.

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

The museum was packed.  Cold rainy summer in Stockholm and every tourist in town decided to go here!

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

 

There was a 1/10 scale reproduction painted as the ship would have been.  I was particularly happy that even the sails were made of strips of fabric 1/10 as wide as the narrow widths of the original sails (large fragments of which were recovered and preserved!)

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

The ship was covered in amazing carvings celebrating Sweden and the King:

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

There were painted reproductions of some of the carvings:

The majestic Swedish lion, meant to fill you with awe and wonder…

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

And a carving of a Polish noble crawling under a table as a form of humiliation.  This was placed so you saw it using one of the two (for 200+ men!) toilets on the ship:

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

They had a wonderful display of the different pigments used for colour.  They carefully analysed all the remaining paint traces to recreate the colours.  How magnificent she would have looked on the Baltic Sea, sails full, flags fluttering!

There were also displays of all the objects found with the ship, including clothes and fabric remnants:

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

There was one thing about the museum that really threw me.  It’s 6 stories, and you start out in the middle, on the second or third level.  We went up first, and finished up on the bottom level.  The bottom level had a display about how the ship was preserved, and how they are continually researching how to keep it stable, and also an exhibition ‘Face to Face’ about the people who died when the Vasa sank, and what we know about them from their remains.

This was fascinating.  They have been able to reconstruct what they looked like, and sometimes even their exact clothes (and if not, they based them off other garments found with the Vasa).

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

They even determine that three of the remains found near each other all had unusual genetic anomalies (skulls not fully fused as adults, and a bulge at the base of the skull) suggesting they were related – perhaps a brother and his two sisters.  It gave a wonderful human dimension to the ship.

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com

However, they also had their actual remains on display.  10 skeletons, laid out in cases.

From a NZ/Hawai’i perspective this is just unthinkable.  You don’t display remains.

I did not expect it at all, was reading with interest, and then turned around and…skeleton.  If there were warnings, I did not see them.  I immediately turned back around, and kept my back to that case for the whole exhibition.  I was so startled I had to google afterwards to be sure of what I’d seen.

It’s not a case of squeamishness or fear.  It’s simply that for me looking at the remains of people who would have wanted, based on their own culture and religion, to be buried in a specific way, is culturally unacceptable.  I couldn’t bring myself to do it.  I completely understand that Sweden is not NZ or Hawai’i, but it still threw me.

So, utterly fascinating and wonderful museum featuring an amazing, iconic piece of history and archeology that I’ve read so much about over the years.  And an unexpected lesson in cultural and museumology differences.

Vasa Museet Stockholm thedreamstress.com