Latest Posts

Rate the Dress: Puffed sleeves & pumpkin orange

A colleague and I were discussing Anne of Green Gables and her love of puffed sleeves today. It’s amazing how that episode has become such a defining feature of so many of our formative years – and often our introduction to historical fashion. In keeping with our talk, I’ve picked an 1890s dress with the puffiest of puffed sleeves for this week’s Rate the Dress, although the colour might not have been so much to Anne’s taste – at least not for long.

Last week: a 1920s number in tomato red and fuchsia with gold

Ratings for last week’s dress were all over the place – everything from 1 to 10, and every number in between (except 2, which rather disappoints me. 2 is a much more inventive rating than 1 – it says “I really don’t like this, but I have thought about exactly, exactly why). There were four times as many 10s and 1s, but also quite a lot of the in-betweens, which will explain the rating of…

The Total: 7.5 out of 10

Rather low, seeing as the single most common rating was 9, 10 was the second most common rating, and 8 was the third!

This week:  an 1890s reception gown in pumpkin orange

The puffed sleeves of this dress are, the obvious link to Anne of Green Gables, but the colour reminds me of another, slightly more obscure part of her story. Remember the episode of the pumpkin preserves in Windy Willows/Windy Poplars (depending on which country your version was published in)? Anne loves them the first time she is served them, and raves about ‘eating preserved sunshine’ – only to be served them at every house she’s invited to as school principal, and to be given jars to take home, until she is heartily sick of them.

Well, this dress is just the colour I imagine pumpkin preserves to be – and google images concurs that PP may come in as many different shades of golden orange as Augusta Auctions has given us colour options for this dress.

Reception gown, 1895-1896, labelled ‘Sprague Battle Creek’, silk faille with silk chiffon, net, and beading, sold by August Auctions, Lot 400 November 14, 2012 NYC

I can’t tell you exactly what colour the dress is in real life, but I can tell you a bit more about it. It is classic mid 1890s in style – the extremely large, but slightly soft leg-o-mutton sleeves are a very helpful clue for dating.

Reception gown, 1895-1896, labelled ‘Sprague Battle Creek’, silk faille with silk chiffon, net, and beading, sold by August Auctions, Lot 400 November 14, 2012 NYC

The silk faille paired with a soft and delicate chiffon, bright colour, and lavish beaded embellishment on the bodice identify it as a formal dress for indoor daytime wear – a reception gown.

Reception gown, 1895-1896, labelled 'Sprague Battle Creek', silk faille with silk chiffon, net, and beading, sold by August Auctions, Lot 400 November 14, 2012 NYC
Reception gown, 1895-1896, labelled ‘Sprague Battle Creek’, silk faille with silk chiffon, net, and beading, sold by August Auctions, Lot 400 November 14, 2012 NYC

The bodice decoration is very interesting. The heavy use of pearl beads provides visual impact from a distance, but it is softened and diffused by the chiffon veiling, which contrasts with the more structural elements of the dress, and hints at the Edwardian aesthetic to come.

Reception gown, 1895-1896, labelled ‘Sprague Battle Creek’, silk faille with silk chiffon, net, and beading, sold by August Auctions, Lot 400 November 14, 2012 NYC

The pearl beading continues on to the collar, evoking the high collared necklaces made famous by Alexandra of Denmark, arguably the most influential style icon of the late Victorian era.

Reception gown, 1895-1896, labelled ‘Sprague Battle Creek’, silk faille with silk chiffon, net, and beading, sold by August Auctions, Lot 400 November 14, 2012 NYC

Typically of 1890s fashion, the heavily ornamented bodice is paired with a fairly simple skirt – in this case a 5 panel A-line which is almost a perfect match for the Scroop Fantail skirt pattern (currently not available for sale, but about to be re-launched with an expanded size range).

What do you think of this dress? Do you love it as much as Anne loved puffed sleeves? Or like Anne liked PP: quite a lot at first, but the more you see of it, the worse it gets? Or perhaps (drawing from the same Anne book – and spoiler alert for a 90 year old work, if that’s still an issue.) it’s a Pringle dress: terrible at a quick glance, but actually quite wonderful once you get to know it.

Rate the Dress on a Scale of 1 to 10

A reminder about rating — feel free to be critical if you don’t like a thing, but make sure that your comments aren’t actually insulting to those who do like a garment.  Our different tastes are what make Rate the Dress so interesting.  It’s no fun when a comment implies that anyone who doesn’t agree with it, or who would wear a garment, is totally lacking in taste.

(as usual, nothing more complicated than a .5.  I also hugely appreciate it if you only do one rating, and set it on a line at the very end of your comment, so I can find it!  And 0 is not on a scale of 1 to 10.  Thanks in advance!)

The Scroop Fantail Skirt thedreamstress.com

A Victorian Picnic at the Wellington Botanical Gardens

2019 is the 150th anniversary of Wellington’s founding as a city, and there will be events across the year to commemorate the anniversary.

These launched off with a Victorian themed picnic at the Wellington Botanical Gardens in late January.

If you were really trying to focus on the anniversary, that would have been clothes for 1869, but hoopskirts and bustles on a hot midsummers day? To sit on the ground on a picnic blanket? No thank you!

My original plan was to wear clothes from 1919, as if I were at the 50th anniversary picnic, but the dress I was working on turned out a little too obscure – not obviously historical, just sort of…strange if you didn’t know what you were looking.

So I went for Edwardian, which is what what the advertising for the picnic showed anyway: and gave me a chance to wear my purple Scroop Fantail Skirt (the pattern is currently not available for sale, as I update the size range, but it will be back on sale shortly).

The Scroop Fantail Skirt thedreamstress.com

I paired it with my Time Lady Wearing History Edwardian Blouse, a wide leather belt, and a straw boater, for a casual ca. 1900 look.

The Scroop Fantail Skirt thedreamstress.com

Eloise of Linen and Lining also made a Fantail, and her own Wearing History Edwardian Blouse – so we were quite a matched pair!

The Scroop Fantail Skirt by Linen & Linings thedreamstress.com
The Scroop Fantail Skirt by Linen & Linings thedreamstress.com
The Scroop Fantail Skirt by Linen & Linings thedreamstress.com

We had quite a nice time, sitting in the shade and drinking cordial and eating strawberries and enjoying the string music the Gardens put on. We liked the Punch and Judy show they staged significantly less…

The Scroop Fantail Skirt thedreamstress.com

Good times!

The Scroop Fantail Skirt thedreamstress.com
Dress, ca. 1923-1925, silk metal, Nasjonalmuseet for kunst, arkitektur og design via DigitalMuseum.no

Rate the Dress: Fuchsia & Red Make Friends

Last week’s Rate the Dress was made up in an extremely classic blue and white stripe – a timeless colour combination and pattern. This week I’ve gone for something decidedly more daring, with a tomato red and fuchsia pairing that few decades would presume to attempt.

Last week: an 1860s day dress (part of a robe a transformation) in blue and white stripes.  

The blue and white stripe of last week’s Rate the Dress was so classic I was pretty sure no one would actually hate it – and as I predicted, the the ratings were more focused on the few things that weren’t perfect, or the fact that it was lovely but couldn’t really be counted as memorable or spectacular, than on the [amusing but] terrible comparisons that some dresses attract.

The Total: 8.8 out of 10

It really pleases me that last week was 7.9 and this week is 8.8. It just feels like balance has been achieved in the universe…

This week:  a 1920s number in tomato red and fuchsia with gold

The 1920s were a daring era for fashion, carrying the style innovations of the 1910s to bold extremes, including the bright colours and improbable hue pairings that started with early 1910s Ballet Russes and ‘exotic’ inspired designs. This dress, which ties tomato red and fuchsia purple together with gold designs that look like they were taken from the margins of illuminated manuscripts, is one such example:

Dress, ca. 1923-1925, silk metal, Probably made in the UK, Nasjonalmuseet for kunst, arkitektur og design via DigitalMuseum.no

The gold patterning is not the only medieval inspired element to this dress. There is something distinctly tabard or surcote-y about the bold shoulder seam, and the wide sleeves give a nod to the costumes of angels in early Renaissance art:

Dress, ca. 1923-1925, silk metal, Nasjonalmuseet for kunst, arkitektur og design via DigitalMuseum.no
Dress, ca. 1923-1925, silk metal, Nasjonalmuseet for kunst, arkitektur og design via DigitalMuseum.no

The gold motifs are very interesting. The flat designs almost appear to be painted or screenprinted on.

Dress, ca. 1923-1925, silk metal, Nasjonalmuseet for kunst, arkitektur og design via DigitalMuseum.no
Dress, ca. 1923-1925, silk metal, probably made in the UK, Nasjonalmuseet for kunst, arkitektur og design via DigitalMuseum.no

There is something quite theatrical, almost costume-y about the dress, but at the same time nothing to specifically suggest it’s not exactly what the museum identifies it as: an evening dress

Dress, ca. 1923-1925, silk metal, Probably made in the UK, Nasjonalmuseet for kunst, arkitektur og design via DigitalMuseum.no

What do you make of the unusual colour combination and equally unusual motif treatment?

Rate the Dress on a Scale of 1 to 10

A reminder about rating — feel free to be critical if you don’t like a thing, but make sure that your comments aren’t actually insulting to those who do like a garment.  Our different tastes are what make Rate the Dress so interesting.  It’s no fun when a comment implies that anyone who doesn’t agree with it, or who would wear a garment, is totally lacking in taste.

(as usual, nothing more complicated than a .5.  I also hugely appreciate it if you only do one rating, and set it on a line at the very end of your comment, so I can find it!  And 0 is not on a scale of 1 to 10.  Thanks in advance!)