Latest Posts

Rate the Dress: A dress for the summer before the war

Last week fabulous fabric triumphed over something-missing styling, little tassels which creeped most of you out, and truly terrible gloves to deliver a very impressive 8.8 out of 10  for the butterfly ballgown.

Today’s Rate the Dress is a tiny bit late because I purposefully scheduled it that way to give yesterday’s post a little time in the spotlight, and even later because I chose a last-minute RTD substitution for reasons.

Picking an alternate RTD was easy, because I just stuck with the theme of my recent posts on the ideal WWI figure, and my original idea for an all-one-colour, not super exciting fabric gown..  So let’s look at an evening gown designed to flatter one of those ‘ideal’ WWI era figures:

This peach on peach confection features the small, slightly raised waist of 1914, with a draping, gathered bodice which would sit nicely over a low, soft bust (and is rather fighting with the high, stiff bosom of the mannequin its displayed on), and a chiffon over-tunic to the skirt, which would flow over the angle of the ‘ideal’ bottom, and cascade off its fullest point (and isn’t quite done justice by the flat bottom of the mannequin).

The draping off the skirt & bodice give a nod to Japonisme and the influence of the kimono, and to Classical Grecian drapery: both design elements which were extremely fashionable in the 1900s and 1910s.

Intriguingly, though the museum records indicate that the construction of this dress is very well done – indicating an extremely skilled dressmaker, and, likely, a well-off client – the satin may be made of a manufactured natural (rayon, etc.) or a blend of silk and rayon (which did happen).

What do you think?  Would the wearer of this dress be pretty in peach, or just a bit meloncholy?

Rate the Dress on a Scale of 1 to 10.

Pictoral Review, April 1916, thedreamstress.com

The Ideal WWI era figure: Part II

I started my series on the fashionable ideal of the figure in the WWI era (specifically 1913 to 1921, the years covered by the Scroop Rilla Corset) with a look at a Gossards Corset ad which showed a whole variety of ‘ideal’ figures:

Gossard Corsets ad, The Designer Oct 1916, thedreamstress.com

While these figures look diverse, they all have some traits in common, so let’s look at what they are.

The fashionable figures shown in magazines and advertising ca. 1916, whether they are  tall or short, large or small, all tend to feature the following:

  • Low, moderately full busts (larger at the start of WWI, reducing as the war progresses)
  • Small but not tiny or exaggerated waists
  • Full, sloping bottoms, with the fullness quite low (as opposed to the modern fashion, which tends to favour high, pert bottoms).

I call the WWI figure a ‘slight hourglass’ – with a gentle transition from bust to waist to hips, rather than the extreme curves of the early Edwardian era.

Here is the low, full bust:

Pictoral Review, April 1916, thedreamstress.com13

Quaker Oats ad featured in the  Pictoral Review, April 1916, thedreamstress.com

Notice how much lower the bust sits compared to where it would sit when held with a modern bra, and how little support the chemise provides.  Notice also how full the bust is: that’s not a B cup!

This same line is echoed in the fashionable dress of the time, even in illustrations of dress for young girls:

Pictoral Review, April 1916, thedreamstress.com

Young Girls dress featured in  Pictoral Review, April 1916

At the start of the war the slimmer skirts of the early 1910s were still in fashion, so there was still emphasis on slim hips to match, but by 1915 the skirts began to widen, so hip size became inconsequential.

Some corset advertisements, like Gossards, still regularly showed fairly slim hipped figures as their ‘average’ figure:

Pictoral Review, April 1916, thedreamstress.com

Gossards Corset Ad in Pictoral Review, April 1916

But many others showed figures that were proportionally much curvier – a rather lovely demonstration that there has always been variety in the ideal, and that even in advertising the ‘perfect’ figure depended on the brand, the taste of the photographer or illustrator, and the final selection of the editor:

Pictoral Review, April 1916, thedreamstress.com

Kabo Corset advertisement, Pictoral Review, April 1916

And photograph advertisements which depict women with the ideal figures of the time in knit combinations or swimsuits show quite definite hips and bottom curves:

The Designer, October 1916, thedreamstress.com

Setsnug ad in The Designer, October 1916

Notice the low, full bust again.

This one shows a youthful figure, so the bust is smaller, but the waist definition and low-angled bottom are clearly visible.

Pictoral Review, June 1915, thedreamstress.com

Grape-Nuts advertisement, Pictoral Review, June 1915

The full, low bottom was a carry-on from the early 1910s fashion for clinging frocks which cascaded off the angle of the bottom:

Dinner gown by Doeuillet, 1910

Dinner gown by Doeuillet, 1910

One of the women most known for her figure throughout the 1900s & 1910s was swimmer and actress Annette Kellermann, famous for popularising the one-piece swimsuit.

Kellermann sold programmes for developing the perfect body throughout the 1910s, and used her own as the ‘ideal’ model, giving us a very good idea of what was considered desirable in a body:

Pictoral Review, June 1915, thedreamstress.com

Annette Kellermann advertisement, Pictoral Review, June 1915

Next up in the series (after a little break for Rate the Dress and some of my sewing), a look at the way the fashionable figure ideal changed from 1913 to 1921.

SaveSaveSaveSave

SaveSave

Gossard Corsets ad, The Designer Oct 1916, thedreamstress.com

The Ideal WWI era figure: Part I

As a celebration (slightly belatedly) of the release of the Scroop Rilla Corset, over the next few weeks I’ll be doing a series post about the ‘ideal’ figure from 1913 to 1921 – the period covered by the Rilla corset.

The Scroop Rilla Corset Pattern Scrooppatterns.com

I’ll be covering how the figure ideal changed from 1914 to 1921, how corsets and other undergarments were used to achieve the ideal figure and ‘correct’ the less than ideal figure, and how to wear a 1910s corset if you are ‘large above the waist’, and how to fit the Rilla to your figure.

Of course, in any era, beauty is in the eye of the beholder: what the ideal figure is depends on who is describing it, so there are lots of variations.  Part of the reason I really love the 1914-1921 period is that it covers a vast range of fashionable silhouettes within that 7 year range, even within a single year, and with so many different waistlines, necklines, skirt silhouettes and overall ‘looks’, there is a mid-teens style for every body.

To start off with, a look at the range of ideal bodies from a Gossards Corset advertisement from The Designer magazine, October 1916.  Gossard’s was an American corset manufacturer that heavily marketed their range of corsets for specific individual figures, with each different style of corset being designed to mould your particular type of figure into the fashionable ideal.

I’ve got quite a few Gossard’s advertisements in my magazine collection, but this one is particularly interesting as being an early example of the use of Hollywood stars to market fashion and beauty.

Gossard Corsets ad, The Designer Oct 1916, thedreamstress.com

Here we see Gossard’s description of how each corset enhances each figure and corrects its perceived faults:

Gossard Corsets ad, The Designer Oct 1916, thedreamstress.com

Gossard ads typically include photographs of models for each type of figure and corset:

Gossard Corsets ad, The Designer Oct 1916, thedreamstress.com

These images have almost certainly received at least some re-touching (aka, early photoshopping) to idealise the figure even more, but give a good general idea of what actual women, albeit ideal ones, looked like in corsets of the eral

Gossard Corsets ad, The Designer Oct 1916, thedreamstress.com

Gossard Corsets ad, The Designer Oct 1916, thedreamstress.com

Gossard Corsets ad, The Designer Oct 1916, thedreamstress.com

Gossard Corsets ad, The Designer Oct 1916, thedreamstress.com

Gossard Corsets ad, The Designer Oct 1916, thedreamstress.com

Of course, the problem with these is figuring out where your figure would sit. I could plausibly see myself falling into the Average Figure, Arched Back Figure, Large Below Waist, or possibly even the Tall Slender Figure category!