Latest Posts

Theresa’s ca. 1915 dress

It’s been a long time since I did a Textile on Thursday post, and I thought it was high time I resurrected the practice and showed you a few bits more from my collection (also, you are probably well tired of posts about paniers and want something different!).

This item began with a totally unexpected parcel, and what may be my favourite-ever opening paragraph to a letter:

          “Dear Leimomi,

          You know when you inherit a period piece of clothing and don’t know what to do with it?  And then you recall you have a pal who is a fashion historian?  Exactly.”

It was from the wonderful Theresa, model and friend.

She went on to explain that the dress had belonged to her aunt’s husband’s family in Winnebago County, Illinois.  She had no personal connection to it, could I do something with it?

For a few months my ‘something’ was just hoarding it and petting it and drooling over how pretty it is, but now it’s time to share it, and someday soon it will be time to re-create it (I even have the fabric).

The dress is of white cotton muslin, with a cotton net bodice lining.  Based on the construction, materials used, and overall silhouette, I date it to between 1914-1916.  It still has elements of earlier Edwardian fashion, but the skirt is becoming fuller, and is only calf-length, and the rigid body shaping is giving way to the looser ’20s silhouette.

ca. 1916 muslin dress thedreamstress.com

It’s a true size 8-10, with a slight pigeon breast front, and a slightly higher than natural waistline.

ca. 1916 muslin dress thedreamstress.com

Theresa suggested that the dress may have been a graduation frock, as it is similar in style to photographs of her family in graduation gowns at the same era and in the same part of the country.  I agree that that is a distinct possibility – there is something very youthful about the dress, and the size and shaping hint at a young, teenage figure.

ca. 1916 muslin dress thedreamstress.com

One of the most interesting aspects of the dress is the intriguing triangle shaped sleeves, with their narrow forearms, and shaped uppers decorated with beautiful wrapped-thread bobbles.

ca. 1916 muslin dress thedreamstress.com

The other noteworthy feature is the beautiful soutache-work trim on the yoke, waist and skirt above the ornamental grow-pleats.

ca. 1916 muslin dress thedreamstress.com

ca. 1916 muslin dress thedreamstress.com

The skirt ornamentation echoes the Greek Key / meaner motif, while the more elaborate bodice decoration is reminiscent of Eastern European designs, and foreshadows the ’20s fashion for Orientalism.

ca. 1916 muslin dress thedreamstress.com

I particularly love that the designs on the  centre-front and back sash pieces aren’t symmetrical.  It’s very subtle, but clever and unexpected.

ca. 1916 muslin dress thedreamstress.com

ca. 1916 muslin dress thedreamstress.com

The soutache trim is also made of cotton, and was machine sewn on – clearly the work of a very patient and skilled seamstress.  I’m going to need a lot of practice and freehand machine sewing before I can have any hope of recreating this work!

ca. 1916 muslin dress thedreamstress.com

ca. 1916 muslin dress thedreamstress.com

The back of the dress is almost identical to the front, but without the pigeon breast effect.  The back is above, the front below.

ca. 1916 muslin dress thedreamstress.com

The dress fastens on the proper left side with a series of hooks and snaps (domes), which are partly concealed by the sash which wraps from front to back and then hooks on at the back.

ca. 1916 muslin dress thedreamstress.com

The hooks and domes continue all the way to the neckline under the decorative yoke, facilitating dressing over an elaborate full hairstyle, or up and over a petticoat.ca. 1916 muslin dress thedreamstress.com

The dress would have been worn over a white cotton dress-petticoat, as it is too sheer to be worn without one.  If it was (as we suspect) worn by a teenage girl, it probably would have been worn without a corset.

ca. 1916 muslin dress thedreamstress.com

While the dress is essentially unlined, and would have needed petticoats underneath for modesty, the bodice has a full underlayer of cotton netting (now slightly damaged), which provides support and structure.  It helps to create the pigeon breast shape, and also gives enough substance to hold up the elaborate soutached yoke.

ca. 1916 muslin dress thedreamstress.com

The whole dress is a beautiful example of later ‘teens fashion, and the transition from Edwardian fuss to ’20s simplicity.

(also, seriously, I have the best friends ever).

The 1770’s linen paniers – done!

Yay!  The Panier-Along is done! (or at least all the instructions are up, feel free to keep making them and leave a comment on the page with a link to your finished paniers).

Panier-along button2

My paniers are done too.  I won’t have time to do a proper photoshoot with them over a chemise and with stays for a few weeks yet – too busy teaching classes, running off on road trips with friends to the South Island and Art Deco weekend and doing my own sewing to get dressed up.

So here is a quick holder photoshoot with my super-historically-accurate tank top and denim skirt, just to show that they do work:

1770's paniers

1770s paniers

1770s paniers

1770s paniers

The Challenge:  Under It All (undergarments)

Fabric:  Brick-red linen ($2 at an op shop some years ago)

Pattern:  self-drafted, based on the pattern in Corsets and Crinolines and other historical examples

Year:  1760-1780

Notions:  Cane hooping ($6), heavy twill tape (less than 20 cents at an op shop), twill tape ($1), linen thread (inherited from Nana)

How historically accurate is it?  Very – all the materials are as close as I could get to period accurate, and it is hand sewn with linen thread using period stitches.

Hours to complete:  4 of actually sewing, another 8 of documenting and blogging

First worn: Wednesday 6 Feb (Waitangi Day) for photos.

Total cost:  Under $10 (Yay!)

And two final photos – here is Felicity helping me with the last bits of sewing:

Happy lappy kitty

Don't finish it and make me move!

Rate the dress: Gold and glitter in the 1870s

Last week I showed you a very embellished (and everything elsed) yellow ballgown from 1889.  You were a little confused by the bodice design – and you weren’t the only one.  The Met couldn’t decide which was the front and which was the back either.  A few of you loved it, but most of you felt that there was just too much embellishment, and too many different kinds of embellishment, and it came in at a rather disappointing 6 out of 10.

This week, since it is the Embellishment challenge on the Historical Sew Fortnightly, I’m going to risk it and post another heavily embellished dress, this one from a decade before the  yellow ballgown.  Like the ballgown, this afternoon/dinner dress is monocolour and has a variety of different kinds of trim: beading, ruching, buttons, bows, ruffles and pleats, arranged asymmetrically around the dress.

Dress, ca. 1879, French, Maison Cecile Laisne, Metropolitan Museum of Art

Dress, ca. 1879, French, Maison Cecile Laisne, Metropolitan Museum of Art

Dress, ca. 1879, French, Maison Cecile Laisne, Metropolitan Museum of Art

Dress, ca. 1879, French, Maison Cecile Laisne, Metropolitan Museum of Art

Dress, ca. 1879, French, Maison Cecile Laisne, Metropolitan Museum of Art

Dress, ca. 1879, French, Maison Cecile Laisne, Metropolitan Museum of Art

Dress (detail), ca. 1879, French, Maison Cecile Laisne, Metropolitan Museum of Art

Dress (detail), ca. 1879, French, Maison Cecile Laisne, Metropolitan Museum of Art

Dress, ca. 1879, French, Maison Cecile Laisne, Metropolitan Museum of Art

Dress, ca. 1879, French, Maison Cecile Laisne, Metropolitan Museum of Art

What do you think?  Does this frock manage to harmonise all its different embellishments more successfully than last week’s frock?  Or is it another example of too much, with too little logic?

Rate the Dress on a Scale of 1 to 10