Latest Posts

And the winner is…

Heidi!

Picked by BOTH Random.org and Mr D.  First I asked Random based on the 28 comments, and it came up with #12.  Then I realised that lots of the comments weren’t entries, so I culled all of those out, and asked Mr D to pick a number between 1-15, and he gave me #3, which is Heidi without the extraneous comments.  Clearly, she is meant to have these ornaments!

I hope everyone who enters and reads has a fantastic holiday season, whatever holiday it is you are celebrating!

I’ll be doing another (much bigger and better, or at least more costume-y and historical) giveaway in the new year.

Picnic ensembles for 1871

Now that we have seen how artists interpreted outdoor clothes in the early 1870s, lets take a look at some real outfits that might have been worn to picnics in 1871.

For the ladies, dresses would most likely be of plain, unpatterned fabric, trimmed with fringe, braid, and bias strips in either matching or contrasting tones.  The silhouette and would demonstrate the change from the back heavy, oval hoops of the 1860s to the bustled 1870s silhouette.  Fabrics would be of wool, silk, or cotton depending on the weather, and how fashionable and up-to-date the wearer was.

Four silk dresses:

Outdoor dresses, 1867-1871, Metropolitan Museum of Art

If the weather was relatively cool, very fashionable ladies might wear highly trimmed silk dresses, such as this one:

Dress, 1868-69, UK, Collection of the V&A

The design and trim of this dress are very similar to the one shown in Monet’s painting on Monday.

In warmer weather, light cotton dresses similar to the ones shown in Monet’s Women in the Garden would be ideal.

Day dress, 1869, UK, Collection of the V&A

These dresses are quite easily soiled and torn, but also easily put together.  They seem to have been extremely common in the late 1860s and early 1870s, with the bustled effect becoming more and more pronounced as the years went on.

The more practical minded were likely to wear much simpler dresses, such as these:

Afternoon dress, European, 1865-1871, Collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Dress, 1870, American, Collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Older women could wear looser fashions:

Dress, UK, ca 1870, Collection of the V&A

If you wanted to be practical, and fashionable, a wool dress with bright trimmings, such as this one, would be ideal:

Dress, about 1868, American, Boston Museum of Fine Art

Do click on the image to be taken to the museum’s page, because the back view of this dress is lovely.

All of these dresses would be worn with hats, gloves, parasols, and various wraps and shawls: accessories images coming tomorrow!

And what would men wear?  Ummmm….the stuff you see in paintings and drawings.  Not many examples of their extent garments were preserved.

Rate the Dress – Rose Atherton’s 1845 fantasty

Last week Wallis Simpson’s Yves Saint Laurent frock showed us that while the question of whether you can ever be too rich or too thin is still up for debate, having too many bows will drop your score in ‘Rate the Dress’.  The dress just missed out on a 7 out of 10 – coming in at 6.94 out of 10.

I wonder if knowing that Wallis wore the dress coloured it in your mind, so this week, we look at a frock that doesn’t belong to a particular person. Rose Atherton isn’t a woman – it’s a song about a woman.  In 1845 the songsheet was illustrated by a most interesting sketch of artist A. Newsam’s idea of a ‘Rose Atherton’.

Newman depicts his Rose in a simple dark skirt, and an off-the-shoulder military inspired bodice and an off-the-head straw hat.

You can see a larger, mirror image, of the same drawing here.

I find the mix of mid-Victorian fashion and fantasy fascinating.  But attractive?

That part is up to you to decide.

Rate the Dress on a scale of 1 to 10