When I first started the Juno Victorian Goddess dress, there was only one image of my inspiration gown available:
So I guessed what the train looked like, and what the back of the bodice looked like, and lots of other stuff.
And I got it wrong. Because the Met got the Brooklyn Museum’s costume collection and put up more images of the dress, and now I know that the the train looks like this:
The train is fancy, not plain, the bodice laces, and the bodice trimming is much more controlled. And just look at the sleeve details, and the way those pleats fall!
She looks so pleased with herself! And this shot really shows how far off the shoulders the bodice sits:
And the other side of the dress. Now I can see that the tulle catches back up:
And just look how different it looks without a full bustle. Is this an original 19th century image (dubious), or the donor in the 1930s or a later museum model (far more likely)? And is it just me or do the ruffles at the hem look not at all the same as the ones that we see today?
So now that I know what the gown is supposed to look like, I just can’t be content with my version. So, in complete disregard of the poll that I put up on the site, I have pulled the Juno dress pretty much completely apart (at least the skirt part of it), and am putting it back together.
I started by blithely pinning toile fabric to Isabella with mad abandon.
Let’s just say that didn’t work so well:
Then I got smart, and carefully analysed the duchesse satin draping, and did that part. And it looked pretty darn good.
Then I had to decide what to do for the tulle draping. Silk tulle is impossible to find in NZ, so I’m having to be creative.
So, with three imperfect option, I decided I was just going to have to make it work and create a perfect option. I’m un-dyeing the gold silk tulle (and some extra gold tulle which I had dyed black for the Laurel dress) and dyeing it blue to match the duchesse silk. Ridiculously complicated.
I’ll keep you updated!