Historical Sew Fortnightly, Sewing, Textiles & Costume

The Black & White 1916 corset

On Monday I’m going to start living as close as I can to a 1916 lifestyle for two weeks. Naturally, this means I need a wardrobe.  A whole wardrobe post is coming, but for now, let’s start with the item everyone is really interested in: corsets.

Based on my research, the average middle-class NZ housewife in 1916 had between 1 & 3 corsets at any given time: 1 or 2 for everyday wear, and possibly a fancier, more constricting one for dressing up.  Two corsets is ideal for everyday wear, because it means one can be airing while you wear the other.

I’ve decided on two corsets for my experiment.  One, based on a slightly earlier cut, that Leimomi circa 1916 might have had in her wardrobe from before the war, and this one,  reflecting the more recent mid-teens cut:

1916 black and white longline corset thedreamstress.com

Previously all of my 1910s corsets have been based on my personally fitted draft of the 1911 corset in Janet Arnold’s book.   However, very few women in NZ would have had personally fitted corsets.  The 1910s corsets I have studied in NZ collections show clear signs of uneven rubbing, where the body in the corset didn’t exactly match the cut of the corset.

So I thought it would be a good idea to have a corset made exactly from a period pattern, without fitting it specifically to me.  I also wanted a corset from the mid-teens, rather than the early teens.  Enter the 1916 German Ersatz corset pattern in Jill Salen’s Corsets: Historical Patterns & Techniques.  Fraternising with the enemy is a bit scandalous, but it’s one of the only mid-teens patterns out there!

1916 black and white longline corset thedreamstress.com

Although the Ersatz corset dates to 1916, I’m reasonably sure that the base pattern wouldn’t have been significantly different to one from 1914.  The only thing that may have been changed is the looser fit at the bottom front of the corset (note how flappy it is in the photo above), which would accommodate more movement than a tighter, slimmer fit.

1916 black and white longline corset thedreamstress.com

The pattern as drawn in Salen’s book is for a corset with a 22″ waist.  I graded it up three sizes, which makes for a nice, easy to wear on an everyday basis corset, though I’ll probably go back down a size for any future iterations of this pattern.

1916 black and white longline corset thedreamstress.com

Although I went with a straight grade, the corset does fit me quite well.

In general the pattern went together very easily, though there is almost certainly a major flaw in the busk measurements given in the pattern (they are drawn as if they are completely un-evenly spaced, but according to the photo of the extent corset they are evenly spaced), and the waistline does not line up from piece to piece.

1916 black and white longline corset thedreamstress.com

The corset is made from a single layer of black and white striped mattress ticking.

1916 black and white corset thedreamstress.com

The seams are flat felled for strength (I LOVE flat felled seams.  I have to restrain myself from doing them on everything!).

1916 black and white corset thedreamstress.com

It is boned with cable ties, and the boning channels are all made from separate boning  tape.

1916 black and white longline corset thedreamstress.com

I had originally intended to use black grommets on the corset, but when I got out my grommeting equipment I could find all the black backs, but none of the fronts.  Grrrr…  So I had to go with antique silver.

1916 black and white corset thedreamstress.com

Now that is is finished, I’m quite glad I used silver grommets.  They work well with the white lace and the overall very restrained aesthetic of the corset.

Speaking of the lace, it’s my favourite thing about the corset:  I had exactly enough, and it completely makes the whole look.

1916 black and white longline corset thedreamstress.com

As I was sewing the corset it kept reminding me of something, and I finally did a search and realised that Bridges on the Body made a beautiful 1910s corset of black and white ticking, which of course I’ve seen, and other costumers have made black and white striped ones inspired by hers, so it’s become almost a ‘thing’.  My inspiration wasn’t intentional, but I’m sure that subconsciously I remembered the others, and that’s why the fabric seemed so right.

Luckily I like mine best of all the versions (which is good, because I have to wear it) 😉   Black and white can be quite aggressive, especially with a strong contrast, but the  self fabric binding and the wide cotton lace tone down the stripes, and the overall effect is quite restful, which I feel is the correct look for a 1910s corset.  It wasn’t an era of assertive undergarments!

What the item is:  a 1916 corset.

The Challenge:  #7  Monochrome

Fabric/Materials:  1m of  black and white striped 100% cotton ticking (NZ$2 at Fabric-a-Brac)

Pattern:  The 1916 German Ersatz corset from Jill Salen’s Corsets: Historical Patterns & Techniques, graded up three sizes (in retrospect, I could easily have gotten away with grading it only 2 sizes, but it makes a good everyday corset in this size)

Year:  1916

Notions:  1 11″ busk (NZ$20), 1m of vintage cotton lace ($NZ4), 3m corset tapes (NZ $12), cable ties (approx $NZ5), rayon grosgrain corset lacing (approx NZ$8), cotton thread (NZ$1).

How historically accurate is it?  While the weave, materials and hand of the fabric are correct, to the best of my knowledge there are no extent striped 1910s corsets, nor can I find any visual evidence that any existed.  However, there were major fabric and materials shortages during WWI, and corsets were one thing where women were specifically asked to make-do and cut back during the war, both in Germany, and throughout the British Empire, so a not-entirely-standard corset is more plausible.  The cut and construction are spot on, and (other than the pattern), the materials are pretty good, though metal bones were much more common than whalebone (for which I have substituted cable ties) by 1916.  However, this is once again a place where a corsetmaker might have substituted older whalebones (perhaps lifted from an earlier corset), rather than the scarcer metal.  I’m going to go with 80%.  It will a certainly look perfectly accurate with a dress over it 😉

Hours to complete:  14, if you include  grading the pattern.

First worn:  Only for try-ons, but starting on Monday I’ll be living like it’s 1916 for two weeks, so it will get worn every other day.

Total cost:  NZ$52ish/US$40ish.

1916 black and white longline corset thedreamstress.com


  1. Beautiful, and it looks very comfortable. I’ll be interested to learn how you find wearing a corset not tailored to your figure – one of many little reasons I love this project!

  2. sewcharacteristicallyyou.comI am definitely looking forward to hearing about the 1916 project as you go along. I don’t know that I would ever go so far in my historical passion as to try as much as possible to live in the day, but I am definitely interested in hearing how it goes with the corset.


  3. Colette says

    Where do you get your buses from? This looks quite a comfy corset by the way.

  4. It looks so good with the matched stripes and the lace edging. It also looks reasonably comfortable, which is very important when you’re going to be wearing it every other day.

    Even though the stripes aren’t documentable it’s accurate to the spirit of the times, and every girl wants attractive underwear, even if there is a war on.

  5. Oh my dear Leimomi,

    You’ve made a “ready to wear” corset!

    Having been enjoying your blog as long as I have and reading about and seeing your meticulous work, this corset may drive you to distraction.

    It’s in the name of research, history and compassion. Kudos to you for living the life of a 1916 New Zealand, mother, wife, sister. What a tribute to those women.

    Looking forward to following your journey

  6. Alex says

    What are the measurements of this pattern? I have the book, but measuring without scaling up can be inaccurate (I’ve been off by multiple inches before). Also, is this a mid- low- or underbust level at the top?

    On another note, usually I’m a firm believer in the 1/4in bind, but this corset makes it look good. Maybe it’s the stripes…

Comments are closed.