Latest Posts

Dress, mid-1910s, 'Landum Minneapolis', silk taffeta, Goldstein Museum of Design, 2006.043.006a-c

Rate the Dress: Autumn tones from the mid-1910s

It’s the last week of March, which means the last week of #GreatWarMarch themed Rate the Dress picks.   Next week will be something totally different.  Maybe 18th century.  Maybe 1860s.  Who knows!  Definitely not from 1900-1924 though!  To finish up our month-long celebration of Edwardian fashion & history, this week’s Rate the dress is a really, really, fascinating iridescent silk taffeta number from the mid-1910s.

Last week:  An Edwardian Evening Dress

Poor dress last week.  Not only did it have a less-than-ideal mannequin, but no one loved it enough to give it a 10!  It did get some rather nice ratings – but also a lot of not nearly so nice numbers.  The layers of detailing, particularly the organza ruffles, velvet cords, and floral corsage (so, pretty much all of them) came in for a lot of criticism.  Just about everyone agreed that the cut-out layer was glorious, but the more that got added on top of it, the less you liked the dress!

The Total: 6.4 out of 10

Wah wah.

This week: A mid-1910s iridescent silk taffeta ensemble

Lauren of Wearing History shared this dress on Instagram as part of #GreatWarMarch, and I thought it was so fascinating. It’s so striking – just perfect for Rate the Dress.

Dress, mid-1910s, 'Landum Minneapolis', silk taffeta, Goldstein Museum of Design, 2006.043.006a-c

Dress, mid-1910s, ‘Landum Minneapolis’, silk taffeta, Goldstein Museum of Design, 2006.043.006a-c

This outfit was probably worn by the donor’s grandmother, Martha F. Harris Hynes.  She was born in 1882, so would have been in her mid-late 30s when she wore it.

Dress, mid-1910s, 'Landum Minneapolis', silk taffeta, Goldstein Museum of Design, 2006.043.006a-c

Dress, mid-1910s, ‘Landum Minneapolis’, silk taffeta, Goldstein Museum of Design, 2006.043.006a-c

The Goldstein Museum of Design identifies this as an evening dress, but the long sleeves, higher neckline, and overjacket are all unusual features for an evening garment.  This is more likely a formal afternoon ensemble: the type that might have been worn to a wedding (usually held in the day in the 1910s) or a very formal daytime event.

Dress, mid-1910s, 'Landum Minneapolis', silk taffeta, Goldstein Museum of Design, 2006.043.006a-c

Dress, mid-1910s, ‘Landum Minneapolis’, silk taffeta, Goldstein Museum of Design, 2006.043.006a-c

The outfit consists of a jacket with 3/4 sleeves, cape-effect at the front, and ruffled peplum back. A belt of the brighter gold silk taffeta holds the back of the jacket snuggly to the body, and sits above the vivid pink velvet sash of the dress.  Sadly there are no image of the dress without the jacket.

Dress, mid-1910s, 'Landum Minneapolis', silk taffeta, Goldstein Museum of Design, 2006.043.006a-c

Dress, mid-1910s, ‘Landum Minneapolis’, silk taffeta, Goldstein Museum of Design, 2006.043.006a-c

Typically of mid-1910s designs, this ensemble includes a bold and playful mix of colours and design elements.  Complementary hues are offset by touches of clashing colours.  A nod to Orientalism is combined with ruffles and a back view with more than a touch of 18th century inspiration.  Vertical, horizontal and angled lines all work together to bounce the eye around the garment.

Dress, mid-1910s, 'Landum Minneapolis', silk taffeta, Goldstein Museum of Design, 2006.043.006a-c

Dress, mid-1910s, ‘Landum Minneapolis’, silk taffeta, Goldstein Museum of Design, 2006.043.006a-c

From some angles the garment is simple and harmonious, from others it’s visually assertive:  a vivacious mix of colours and elements.

Dress, mid-1910s, 'Landum Minneapolis', silk taffeta, Goldstein Museum of Design, 2006.043.006a-c

Dress, mid-1910s, ‘Landum Minneapolis’, silk taffeta, Goldstein Museum of Design, 2006.043.006a-c

What do you think?  Does it work?

Rate the Dress on a Scale of 1 to 10

(as usual, nothing more complicated than a .5.  I also hugely appreciate it if you only do one rating, and set it on a line at the very end of your comment, so I can find it!  Thanks in advance!)

SaveSaveSaveSaveSaveSave

SaveSave

The Designer, August 1916 thedreamstress.com

Summer fashions from August 1916

I shared a snippet of this fashion spread from the August 1916 issue of The Designer Magazine on Instagram, and thought you might enjoy seeing the full spread.

The Designer was the magazine issued to market Standard Patterns.  It had colour and black and white fashion spreads, advertisements, articles on current events, home advice, and an agony aunt.  Just about everything!

The Designer, August 1916 thedreamstress.com

There is something for everyone in these spreads: shirtwaist and skirt combinations, full dresses, dresses in two parts.  There are more streamlined numbers for the sophisticated girl; frothy, delicate numbers for the lady who likes her frills:

The Designer, August 1916 thedreamstress.com

What do you think?  Which is your favourite?

Evening dress in two parts, Mrs. C. Donovan, New York (Designer), silk, sequins, via Europeana.eu

Rate the Dress: Edwardian Embellishment, American style

This week’s Rate the Dress turns from bold primary hues on black, to soft pastels overlaid with sheer black organza, and from sleek ’20s, to frothy Edwardian.

Last week:  a 1920s little black dress with very bright beading by Patou

The beaded and embroidered Patou number got a range of reactions.  Some of you absolutely loved it, and others thought the beading wasn’t quite resolved.  One of you docked points for the moustache belt, which I am confused by.  How on earth is a moustache belt a bad thing? 😉

I was intrigued by the number of commenters who felt that some 20s dresses ‘wear heavy’, and that this was one of them.

The Total: 8.2 out of 10

A full point lower than the week before!  We’re slipping!

This week: An Edwardian Evening Dress

This dress (despite its weird pin-head) has been on my Rate the Dress list for some time, and this week seemed like the perfect time to showcase it.

European dressmakers seem to get all the glory when it comes to Victorian & Edwardian fashion – but they did have rivals.  The late 19th century saw the rise of a number of extremely talented American dressmakers, including Mrs C Donovan.  Unlike their European counterparts, notable American dress designers were predominantly female.  While they never achieved the cachet of Worth & Pingat, the top levels of American design houses made creations for wealthy Americans who also patronised the European houses.  Some of their creations show workmanship and design details that easily match the more famous European houses.

Whether Mrs C Dovovan achieved that level is for you to decide, but certainly this dress, with its scrollwork cut-outs at hem and bodice, shows an astonishing level of detail and workmanship.

The colours, choice of flowers, and slightly thicker waistline suggest this dress was worn by a more mature woman, rather than a debutant.

Can you see a society hostess reigning over her soiree in this?

Rate the Dress on a Scale of 1 to 10

(as usual, nothing more complicated than a .5.  I also hugely appreciate it if you only do one rating, and set it on a line at the very end of your comment, so I can find it!  Thanks in advance!)

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave