Latest Posts

Let there be light!

In the last half hour of my  crinolines photoshoot with Theresa  (of Existimatio), the sun began to set over the hills of Wellington and lit up the rather spectacular cloud formations in glowing azure and gold.

The 1860s Greek Key tea gown thedreamstress.com

Theresa was madly snapping away, capturing me and the sky, and the gorgeous, glowing light over the city.

The 1860s Greek Key tea gown thedreamstress.com

Suddenly she had an idea.  “Stand right there and let me get your profile against the sun!”

The 1860s Greek Key tea gown thedreamstress.com

So she snapped away, making “Ooooh” noises and telling me to move just a wee bit forward or a wee bit back,* until I became envious and said “Me, Me, Me!  My turn!  I want to try it on you!”

But all I got were photos where Theresa’s hair looked like it was on fire:

1850s Raspberry swirl gown thedreamstress.com

Then I had an idea.  “Raise your hand…no…the far one…yep, that’s just right..now click your fingers”

“Perfect!  Now  LET THERE BE LIGHT!”

And there was.

1850s Raspberry swirl gown thedreamstress.com
When Theresa saw the pictures she said “Oh my god, you’re such a dork!”

Yep, and a happy one at that!

These pictures particularly amuse me because we played ‘Let there be light’ at our last photoshoot as well, but that time it was Theresa’s idea!

 

*ironically, I don’t like most of the photos of me against the sunset because I have a  love/hate relationship with my profile, the fit issues with the Greek Key bodice really bug me, and my hair was beginning to fall out and looks messy and made  my bonnet sit  wrong

A very sweet, very white 1860s chemise

For the Historical Sew Fortnightly Black & White challenge I decided to make a white item, and a black item (and maybe a black and white item if I get very ambitious this evening!)

My white item?  A very sweet, very white, 1860s chemise from the (slightly infamous) Simplicity 9769 Martha McCain ‘The Fashion Historian’ chemise/corset/drawers pattern.

Simplicity 9769 1860s chemise

Under normal circumstances, I wouldn’t have bought this pattern, because I usually use period patterns, or make something based off an original item I’ve studied or own (I know it sounds snobbish, but I’d rather know that anything weird, hard to work through or mistake-y is my own fault!).  But…I’m teaching sewing so I’m trying to use a lot more commercial patterns, so that I can advise students on them.

Oh, and also, the pattern was basically free.  At one of the first Fabric-a-Bracs I went to someone was selling a bag with all the bits for a corset: busk, aiglets, grommets, lacing, and this pattern, for (if I remember correctly) $15!  Which is less than a busk costs.  So I snapped it up, and have added all the bits to my corset making stash (and probably used them since).

As long as I had the pattern, I thought I’d best give it a try!

I was, to say the least, very pleasantly surprised by the pattern.  I cut the size 10, rather than the 14/16 I am based on the measurements (let’s just say that when it comes to Simplicity sizing, I wasn’t born yesterday!), and it made up beautifully.  It really is a period-accurate  pattern, and while I prefer more description of why things are done, and why they are period accurate in my patterns (a la Wearing History), if you already know how 1860s undergarments work, or don’t care about the research behind a garment, the pattern is just fine as it is.

Simplicity 9769 1860s chemise

The pattern was actually very easy to make and put together, though I imagine it would really throw you if this was your first attempt at gussets and geometric patterning.  Every piece in the pattern is a rectangle or triangle, and fitting them together is a fun puzzle .  Each step is well described (except for step 15, where the drawing shows you putting in the sleeve reinforcement panel backwards), but it does help to have a mental picture of how it’s all going to fit together in the end.

Simplicity 9769 1860s chemise  thedreamstress.com

This was a pattern where pattern markings were very important.  In fact, you can still see my yellow X markings all over the chemise, as I haven’t had a chance to launder them out yet!

Simplicity 9769 1860s chemise  thedreamstress.com

For trim, I used some vandyke (a bit of a theme in my lace choices recently) broderie anglaise that I also picked up at Fabric-a-Brac, and vintage shell buttons that have been in my stash forever.

Simplicity 9769 1860s chemise  thedreamstress.com

I made life difficult for myself by sewing the lace down right to the edges – lots of sinking and turning as I navigated those points.

Simplicity 9769 1860s chemise  thedreamstress.com

I did all the handsewing with a silk thread, which took most of my time as the cotton is very tightly woven, and hard to handsew through, especially as chilblains begin to claim my hands for another winter.

Simplicity 9769 1860s chemise  thedreamstress.com

The Challenge:  #9  —  Black & White

Fabric:  2.2m of white cotton lawn (from the $5 bin at Fabric Warehouse).

Pattern:  Simplicity 9769 Martha McCain ‘The Fashion Historian’ chemise/corset/drawers pattern

Year:  1857-68

Notions:  1.5m white cotton broderie anglaise trim (also a Fabric-a-Brac find), 2 vintage shell buttons, silk and cotton thread.

How historically accurate is it?    Because I was just trialling the pattern, I wasn’t too worried about being period perfect.  The chemise is primarily machine sewn (pushing it for the early 1860s), though I did do the finishing by hand.  The fabric is a tiny bit thin and crisp compared to most period examples, but not beyond the boundaries of normal mid-19th century undergarment fabrics.  My lace is a bit modern, but the buttons are perfect.  So….70%?

Hours to complete:  4.  Really easy except for sewing the lace rows so close to the sleeve gather.

First worn:  Just for  photos, though it will appear in a lecture at Handmade at the end of the month.

Total cost:  $5.00 for the fabric, and another $3 in lace and notions.

I wanted to do a photoshoot with this chemise and my blue corset and red hoops, and the paisley petticoat, but as always, time was short, so I settled for a quick snap of me in the chemise.

Simplicity 9769 1860s chemise  thedreamstress.com

Rate the Dress: Doucet’s striking stripes

Based on the lack of rating, most of you were rather meh about last week’s Dance Off frocks (or meh about the idea), though the reaction from those who did rate them was reasonably positive.  Those of you who didn’t like the second dress disliked it’s sleeves, and those of you who did like it, felt that the woman wearing it ‘owned it’.  The first lady fared the tiniest bit better, just beating out her rival with a score of 7.4 out of 10 vs 7 out of 10 for the second.

In honour of the HSF Black & White theme, this week’s Rate the Dress is black and white (in fact, it’s one that I featured as inspiration for the challenge).

This Doucet evening gown features bold, graphic black and white (well, ivory) stripes.  One stripe pattern forms chevrons on the skirt, while another accentuates the curves of the bodice.  The face is framed with a wide collar in a balanced stripe.

Evening Dress, Jacques Doucet, 1890s, The Mint Museum

Evening Dress, Jacques Doucet, 1890s, The Mint Museum

The Mint Museum chose to pair the gown with black lace gloves, a black reticule, a fur wrap, a detailed choker necklace, and an aigret in the hair.  Personally, I rather hope the dress was worn with shoes like these!

What do you think?  I’ve only ever featured one other Doucet dress on Rate the Dress, and it didn’t fare too well.  This one is similarly daring and avant garde – strikingly simple for the 1890s in its lack of ornamentation, and rather mad in the usage of different kind of stripes.  Will it be too odd?

Rate the Dress on a Scale of 1 to 10