It’s only been three weeks since we launched the Amalia Jacket pattern…but…there’s a new Scroop Pattern!
And it’s free!
I thought it would be nice to start 2021 by putting out something fun and silly, and giving something back to the costuming community.
And what’s more fun than a big huge puffy bum cushion? Meet the Frances Rump – a free pattern which will give you the perfect fashionable silhouette for 1775-1795.
The Bum Shop, 1785. Lewis Walpole Library
I researched and made bum rumps to go with the Amalia Jacket. I took my prototypes to the Historical Sew & Eat Retreat, where they were a big hit with the other costumers. (“Can I borrow your bum?” is a normal sentence in my world 🤣)
The Frances Rump is based on extant rumps and images of rumps in the late 18th century.
It features detailed historically accurate instructions, including information on choosing fabrics and fillings, the stitches to use, and how to adjust the filling to get just the right silhouette.
View A is a larger rump that creates the full-bottomed, round-hipped shape fashionable between 1775-1787.
View B is a smaller rump that creates the back-focused silhouette, with fullness concentrated only over the rear, fashionable from 1785-1795.
Elisabeth (red petticoat) is wearing the View A rump with her Amalia Jacket. Jenni (white petticoat) is wearing the View B rump with her Amalia Jacket.
Enjoy! Can’t wait to see your Frances Rump makes on social media! (another sentence you’d only get in the costuming world!)
I’ve got a bit of a tradition on Rate the Dress of sharing a wedding dress for New Years. A dress to celebrate a big change, and a new life. That doesn’t mean it’s acres of white silk every New Years though. Women in the past got married in all sorts of fabrics, in all sorts of shades. This year’s wedding dress is an 1850s number in soft green. Let’s find out how you feel about it!
Most of you loved last week’s dress. You adored the sparkle and colour, and thought it was the perfect blend of ornamentation and simplicity. Others thought it might be a bit matronly. And some of you thought it was just not quite right: not well thought out and poorly balanced. But nobody hated it, so there’s something to be said for that!
The Total: 8.8 out of 10
Pretty good! And a pleasing 1.1 point up from last week, which appeals to my sense of organisation.
This week: an wedding dress in soft green from 1850
This wedding dress is a perfect example of the transition from classic 1840s style to classic 1850s style, having many elements of both.
Wedding dress, 1850, England, silk, cotton, 145.0 cm (centre back) 51.0 cm (sleeve length) National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne Gift of Mrs Betty Blunden, 1979, D5-1979
The skirt is wide enough to accomodate a large hoop, but still has a clear bell shape.
The bodice features a crisp fan-pleated front, a very popular feature in the 1840s that became less common and fashionable as the 1850s progressed.
Wedding dress, 1850, England, silk, cotton, 145.0 cm (centre back) 51.0 cm (sleeve length) National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne Gift of Mrs Betty Blunden, 1979, D5-1979
The bodice features a false front closure ornamented with wrapped thread toggle buttons. Their aqua shade complements the hues in the brocaded flowers of the silk fabric.
Note the double layer of extremely fine piping finishing the waistline. Double piping edge finishes, particularly at the waist, are seen on many 1840s and 50s dresses, although this is a particularly narrow example.
The fabric features four different kinds of flowers, some realistic, some more fantastical. There are roses, and one that two that look like looks like a rose surrounded by small flowers. The other two are daisies or chrysanthemums (or perhaps a waterlily for one of them?).
Wedding dress, 1850, England, silk, cotton, 145.0 cm (centre back) 51.0 cm (sleeve length) National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne Gift of Mrs Betty Blunden, 1979, D5-1979
The sleeves are widening into the classic pagoda shape of the 1850s. They would probably have been worn with decorative cotton engageantes underneath.
Wedding dress, 1850, England, silk, cotton, 145.0 cm (centre back) 51.0 cm (sleeve length) National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne Gift of Mrs Betty Blunden, 1979, D5-1979
The cuffs have very interesting trimmings: strips of self fabric unravelled on each edge to create a soft fringe, and gathered in to create a soft ruched puff.
Wedding dress, 1850, England, silk, cotton, 145.0 cm (centre back) 51.0 cm (sleeve length) National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne Gift of Mrs Betty Blunden, 1979, D5-1979
What do you think? The perfect mix of new and classic for a mid-century bride? Or does the old rhyme about ‘Married in green, ashamed to be seen’ apply?
Rate the Dress on a Scale of 1 to 10
A reminder about rating — feel free to be critical if you don’t like a thing, but make sure that your comments aren’t actually insulting to those who do like a garment. Phrase criticism as your opinion, rather than a flat fact. Our different tastes are what make Rate the Dress so interesting. It’s no fun when a comment implies that anyone who doesn’t agree with it, or who would wear a garment, is totally lacking in taste.
As usual, nothing more complicated than a .5. I also hugely appreciate it if you only do one rating, and set it on a line at the very end of your comment.
I thought you might enjoy a little insight into the inspiration behind the Amalia Jacket, and the design and patternmaking process.
After making the Augusta Stays pattern, Amber & I knew we wanted to do something 1780s that could be worn over them.
We discussed a couple of options and came up with a shortlist of things we loved that weren’t well covered by other patterns. I left the final decision up to Amber, and she settled on a jacket pattern with both a longer version, and a short pierrot version.
It’s a great piece to work from as a patternmaker, because the design lines are so clear, and the stripes make the grainlines and angles very obvious.
Note the pleats on the jacket’s skirt, the higher, rounded neckline, the 3/4 length instead of elbow-length sleeves, and the cutaway front.
For a short ‘pierrot’ version she also looked at this jacket from the Met. It’s very similar to the Musee Galliera caraco, but with a shorter skirt. There are nearly identical skirt pleats, a similar cutaway front, and those slightly longer sleeves.
And this pierrot from the Kyoto Costume Institute:
Pierrot jacket, 1780s, silk, Kyoto Costume Institute
We really wanted a second front view, to maximise the mix-and-match potential of the pattern. A plain front was the obvious choice: while there aren’t as many examples of jackets with plain fronts as there are with cutaway fronts, they definitely existed. A plain front gives so many options for playing with design features, and let’s more adventurous sewers take advantage of those and really customise the pattern.
Inspiration for the second front view came from pieces like this pierrot from the Kyoto Costume Institute. It’s dated to the 1780s, but still has the short sleeves of the 1760s-70. It appears to have a one-piece center fastening front.
Jacket, 1780s, Kyoto Costume Institute
There’s also this cute cotton jacket from the 1790s. Note the horizontal sleeve stripes. Both are seen in the 1770s-1790s, which is why the pattern includes either grainline for the sleeves. Interestingly this one has almost entirely straight sleeves, with no curve at the elbow.
Jacket, cotton, ca 1790
We also looked at other jackets, including a couple from Colonial Williamsburgs collection (unfortunately their online collection database is has been unavailable for a while), and ones representing regional styles from the Netherlands, where plain fronts and longer skirts were very popular.
With all that in mind, Amber took the most relevant elements and draped a pattern using 18th century methods.
She sent me the pattern, and I used CAD software to turn it into a digital pattern, and adapted the draped pattern to one that could be altered and graded using modern patternmaking techniques and software.
Then we spent 5 months in intense pattern-tweaking, instruction-writing, and ‘if I do X to the pattern to make the fit more accurate as it gets graded into a different size range is that still 18th c accurate?’ mode.
Sleeve patterns flew back and forth across the world. Many unflattering fitting photos were taken in the midst of lockdown by somewhat exasperated husbands.
Miniature versions of the jacket were made to test construction techniques until we arrived at an assembly method that we agreed was the best possible blend of completely accurate, easy to alter and fit, and easy to sew.