Latest Posts

The Home Front at the Museum of Wellington City and Sea

Photos!  Pretty, pretty photos from my talk at the Museum of Wellington City & Sea!

And lots of them!  (well, of course.  This is me we’re talking about!)

And then, down at the bottom, some unexpectedly serious musing.  (well, of course.  This is me we’re talking about!)

The talk covered the immediate before-the-war fashions, and the effect of WWI on fashions during and after the war.

Usually I use my own models, but this time MWCS arranged all the models – a group of gorgeous girls (and by gorgeous I mean ‘interesting and lovely people’ not ‘look like a magazine model’) from a local college (that’s a high school in the US) or WelTec (a college in the American sense) and museum staff and friends for the men.  I  missed my usual models because they are so fabulous, but really enjoyed getting to work with a new group, because they were also fabulous.

Before the talk, with models, and the amazing Sarah who arranged the whole event in my Poiret dress:

The Home Front at the Museum of Wellington City & Sea thedreamstress.com - 1

The Home Front at the Museum of Wellington City & Sea thedreamstress.com - 4

Because we had male models as well as female, I was able to cover  the importance of being in uniform to men at the time, and the societal contexts that made NZ men so willing and eager to participate in the war.

The uniform isn’t my work – it’s a rented piece.

The Home Front at the Museum of Wellington City & Sea thedreamstress.com - 6

We also had a lovely rented 1920s dress, which I used to demonstrate the actual type of 1920s frock that most girls in New Zealand wore in the early-mid ’20s.

The Home Front at the Museum of Wellington City & Sea thedreamstress.com - 8

It also gave me an excuse to discuss  the difference between the flapper archetype as it is imagined today, the flapper archetype as it existed in the US in the 1920s, and the word flapper as it was used in New Zealand in the ’20s, where it mainly referred to schoolgirls trying things out (so most of the references refer to ‘flappers with their plaited pigtails bouncing’ or ‘a flapper with her hair pinned up for the first time’ – which isn’t how we think of flappers today at all!).  The model was quite amused to be a ‘flapper’ in her demure pink dress, and it was lovely that she was the right age too.

The Home Front at the Museum of Wellington City & Sea thedreamstress.com - 9

One of the real triumphs of the night for me was the Luna Moth dress.  I’ve never been in love with the gown.  In fact, most of the time I don’t even like it.  But on the model of the night?  It was spectacular!  We only got a few photos of her in it, but she looked phenomenal.

The Home Front at the Museum of Wellington City & Sea thedreamstress.com - 5

(I promise that that was steamed and pressed to absolute perfection when she left the dressing room – some silks just crumple the minute you breath on them!)

The other triumph of the night was my 1907 swimsuit.  The model was particularly charismatic, and I made a new pair of dazzle stockings to go with the swimsuit, a la the fashion plate in this post.

The Home Front at the Museum of Wellington City & Sea thedreamstress.com - 7

I’m even happier with this pair than the first – they are more period accurate, and the pattern flows better.  Now I just need to make a shorter 1910s swimsuit to wear with them… (it never ends!)

The Home Front at the Museum of Wellington City & Sea thedreamstress.com - 12  After the talk there were drinks and snacks and mingling:

The Home Front at the Museum of Wellington City & Sea thedreamstress.com - 11

And then a demonstration of period hair and makeup by WelTec.

The Home Front at the Museum of Wellington City & Sea thedreamstress.com - 13

The  hair and makeup demonstrations were focused on hair and makeup as you would do it for movies or stage today, extrapolating the beauty ideals of each period to create a look.  Very few women, particularly in New Zealand, would have been wearing much, if any, makeup in period.  There was lots of fascinating historical information given with the talk about hair and makeup and the ideals of each period.

It was quite different for me to have all the models with professional makeup jobs, and fully styled wigs.  Usually when I do talks the models wear absolute minimal makeup, because that’s period for most periods.  If I were to do, say, full 18th century makeup, I would want it to be very historical,  and at the moment I don’t have the time and resources for that.

Sometimes I’m lucky enough to have Claire of The Vanity Case or Maryanne or someone else with a good grounding in period hair to do hairstyles for my models, otherwise I demonstrate to the models beforehand what we are aiming for, and we do our best on the day.

So it was different and unusual to have everyone so made up and glamorous, and while they looked stunning, they almost looked too perfect.  They were so uniformly polished and coiffed that it showed that they were all made up and styled to the same design.

The Home Front at the Museum of Wellington City & Sea thedreamstress.com - 10

A  single, perfectly executed, stylised theme is  a conceit that works beautifully onstage or onscreen, because it helps to create the world of the story, and to add to the interaction between characters, and the suspension of disbelief.  Think of Coppola’s Marie Antoinette as the perfect example.

I don’t think such uniform perfection  worked quite as well for the reality I try to show in period dress. I want everyone to look beautiful, but also like they had dressed and styled themselves – as if you had walked into a room in the period, and, just like a party today, every woman would have her own way of presenting herself.  All styled, they looked like bridesmaids or beauty pageant models (in a really nice way – the ones you’d pin on pinterest as a daydream of achieving that!).

So they were absolutely stunning, but in the end I’m happy that I won’t usually be able to have my models looking quite so  perfect.

The Home Front at the Museum of Wellington City & Sea thedreamstress.com - 3

All in all, a very successful and fascinating evening, and lots of wonderful new experiences for me.  Many thanks to the Wellington Museum’s Trust for having me!

Rate the Dress: Elizabeth Craven, Lady Powis, in flora and fauna

Last week’s Rate the Dress entry was an 1860s gown transitioning from late crinoline to early bustle.  The general  consensus was that the transition was a bit problematic – the lace hip ruffle, and unresolved bustle fullness, plus the hard-to-swallow (pun intentional) from a modern viewpoint high throat, but that the dress still had a lot of lovely points – earning it a respectable but not stellar 7.6 out of 10.

This week we’re looking at a 17th century portrait featuring Elizabeth Craven, Lady Powis, in a coordinating jacket and skirt featuring embroidered flora and fauna.

The elaborate embroidery on the skirt and bodice highlight Elizabeth’s skill as a needlewoman, and her knowledge of plants and animals.  The sheen of fabric suggests that the embroidery might have been done on silk, rather than the more common linen.  This, along with her sumptuous double-pearl earrings, pearl necklace, and lush lace cuffs and collar, demonstrate her wealth.

The portrait makes a clear statement about Elizabeth’s status and accomplishments.  Does it do an equally successful job of speaking up for her taste?

Previous early 17th century fashions (invariably portraits)  on Rate the Dress have been criticised for the improbably low necklines, which manage to dip well below the armpits without showing the slightest hint of cleavage, and the more peculiar silhouettes, like hanging sleeves and wheel farthingales.  Will Elizabeth, with her V neckline and more subdued silhouette, fare better?

Rate the Dress on a Scale of 1 to 10.

A practice in Practicality: doing housework, 1910s style

Since the Historical Sew Monthly Challenge for May is ‘Practicality’ and one of my submissions for it is a 1910s blouse (from the Wearing History Elsie blouse pattern), I thought I should actually test the practicality of said blouse.

Now, a blouse is a very practical garment – for a 1910s wardrobe.  It was inexpensive, versatile and washable, and was basically the 1910s version of a T-shirt.

But how much could you actually do in it?

And full 1910s undergarments (corset, combination, petticoats), skirt, and heeled shoes.  Plus a period apron for the messy  stuff.

Well, I spent half a day in the full outfit  and I managed to:

– tidy the house (general putting away the 37 things in each room that the elves seem to pull out of the drawers and closet every night and leave strewn about the house)

– sweep the kitchen, lounge, and hall

– mop the kitchen

– wash dishes (by hand)

– dust the dining room

– do laundry (OK, with a washing machine)

– make dinner

It looked a bit like this:

Doing housework in 1910s clothes thedreamstress.com - 1

Doing housework in 1910s clothes thedreamstress.com - 1 (1)

Doing housework in 1910s clothes thedreamstress.com - 2

And you know what?  It really wasn’t bad at all.

I was really hot when I first finished getting dressed, but my body quickly adjusted, and all the natural fibres breathed nicely.  Once I’d settled into it and started working temperature wise, I was just as comfortable as I would have been in jeans and a cardigan.

The heels were a bit of an issue, but that’s more my Hawaiian-bred aversion to shoes indoors than a comment on the type of shoes.

The shorter hem made it easy to bend over to sweep and mop and pick up things.

The sleeves rolled up, and stayed rolled up, for dishwashing and cooking.

Doing housework in 1910s clothes thedreamstress.com - 1 (2)

And the corset was actually fantastic.  All that back support while sweeping and bending over to pick things up was really, really helpful.  At the end of cleaning I felt much perkier than I normally would.

I was also surprised by how little the longline corset got in the way of bending over to do things once I was really settled in to it.  After an hour I didn’t notice it as an impediment at all.

Doing housework in 1910s clothes thedreamstress.com - 2 (1)

In fact, I was just about to  deem 1910s clothes just as practical as modern wear for housework, when I discovered the one entirely strange and unexpected thing I can’t do well in them.

I bent over to pick up Felicity.

Bending over – no problem.

Picking up Felicity – no problem.

Holding Felicity.  Now that was an issue.

The corset did such a beautiful job of smoothing out all my lumps and curves, and creating a seamless line from bust, down over my hips,  that, with the addition of the high waist of the skirt, there was just nowhere on my body for Felicity to nestle in to.

Normally when I pick her up I can rest her against the curve of my stomach (see, non-flat stomachs are awesome), or the hollow of my waist against my hip.

Wearing History's 1917 combinations thedreamstress.com

In a longline corset?  Nope.  She just kept sliding down, and eventually I had to give up and put her down.

If this happens with a 4 kilo cat, I’m assuming the same thing happens with babies.  Which makes 1910s clothes perfect for light manual labour, terrible for being a mother.

Interesting.

More research needs to be done! (which does sound rather like a weird hint about me and kids, but it’s not).

Doing housework in 1910s clothes thedreamstress.com - 3