Latest Posts

1910s evening gowns thedreamstress.com

An Edwardian Evening Gown Interlude II: a touch of modern

Here are more photos from my Edwardian evening gown photoshoot with Theresa.  These ones are by our friend Daniil @dmanww, who is seriously the most amazing person ever.  He’s always ready to help with anything, including a photoshoot.  Sometimes behind the camera, sometimes in front of it:  Daniil has also modelled for me!

We took most of these photos at the memorial at the Basin Reserve, the old Wellington Cricket grounds.  It was hard to keep out all the modern additions and architecture around the memorial out of the photos.  After realising how much that limited our angles, we stopped trying to be strictly historical.  It was fun mixing it up, with shots of selfies, and 1970s grandstands in the background.

What do you think?  Should we try to keep it as plausibly period as possible, or is an interesting photo good even if it’s very anachronistic?

1910s evening gowns thedreamstress.com

1910s evening gowns thedreamstress.com

1910s evening gowns thedreamstress.com

1910s evening gowns thedreamstress.com

1910s evening gowns thedreamstress.com

1910s evening gowns thedreamstress.com

1910s evening gowns thedreamstress.com

Other Theresa photoshoots include:

Rate the Dress: a tea gown with attitude

Today was a public holiday in New Zealand (Waitangi Day).  Most people took a four day weekend, so it’s thrown my usual scheduling out.  So apologies for the slightly belated Rate the Dress.  To make up for it, I’ve picked a VERY exciting Rate the Dress: a relatively unknown 1890s Pingat tea gown (probably) that caused quite a stir when I shared it on Instagram earlier this week.

Last week:  a ca. 1820 dress re-made from 18th century chine a la branche

I’m on a Rate-the-dress roll!  Once again, the majority of you loved the frock, though there were a few caveats.  The two main complaints were about the wide sleeves, the sleeve trim, and the muted colours.  Wider, more relaxed sleeves were often a feature of late 1810s fashions.  Chine, by its nature, is muted, and this was a particularly restrained example.

The Total: 8.7 out of 10

Not quite as good as the week before, but still a very good score indeed.

This week:  A c. 1892 Pingat ‘tea dress’ or tea gown

Since some of you didn’t care for last week’s muted hues, I present a decidedly un-muted 1890s couture creation:

The National Gallery of Australia has labelled this striking confection a ‘tea dress’ (by which I presume they mean a tea gown – read more about them here).  Whatever this gown is, it’s a very unusual garment.  Some of the elements are not entirely typical of a tea gown.  The dress ismore fitted, with more emphasis on the waist, than is usual for a tea gown.

It could almost be fancy dress, but for what?  The sleeves are decidedly Elizabethan.  The choice of fabrics and the colours are decidedly un-Elizabethan.  The ruff collar, as wacky as it is, is quite restrained for a fancy-dress collar.  It could be a theatre costume, but I’ve never heard of Pingat making theatre costumes.

The combination of historicism, exoticism, and theatrical elements is typical of late Victorian tea gowns.  The use of lavish and expensive fabrics in a garment that could only be used for a limited range of social functions was also typical of a tea gown.  By the 1890s, tea gowns were less likely to be loose, comfortable garments that could be donned without assistance, increasing the chances that this was indeed a tea gown.  Late Victorian tea gowns were also more likely to fill the function of a hostess gown: being slightly more outrageous than what your guests would wear, which certainly describes this dress.

So, with no obvious clues to the contrary, I shall assume that the NGA means tea gown when they say tea dress, and that their classification is entirely correct.

With that aside, what do you think of the dress itself?  Tea gowns were not meant to be shrinking violet garments, but is this one a bit too outre?

Rate the Dress on a Scale of 1 to 10

(as usual, nothing more complicated than a .5.  I also hugely appreciate it if you only do one rating, and set it on a line at the very end of your comment, so I can find it!  Thanks in advance!)

Corset Cutting & Making Review thedreamstress.com

Review: Corset Cutting & Making

Last April I saw the kickstarter for a Marion McNealy’s ‘Revised Edition: Corset Cutting & Making‘: an annotated reprint of a rare early 1920s corset book.  It was right within my area of study, and being able to get the patterns as digital copies was a nice perk.  So I signed up.

The book arrived last week, and I’ve had a thorough read of it.  Time for a review!

Corset Cutting & Making Review thedreamstress.com

The Research:

Revised Edition: Corset Cutting & Making takes an original 40-page early 1920s publication, which features 19 patterns for corsets and related items, and re-organises it into a form that is more logical for the modern corsetmaker and researcher.  McNealy supplements the original patterns and texts with additional research and annotations.  These set the corsets within the design contexts of their time, and clarify period terms and construction techniques.

The depth and quality of the supplementary annotations are excellent.  All aspects of corset materials and construction from 1900-1924 are covered. There is a step-by-step breakdown of construction techniques taken directly from period sources.  There are detailed descriptions of the materials to use, including boning, binding, and fabrics.   The most popular fabric colours by year are even covered!

Corset Cutting & Making Review thedreamstress.com

There are guides to measuring yourself using period techniques:

Corset Cutting & Making Review thedreamstress.com

Every aspect of the research is exemplary.  It’s clearly been thoroughly thought-out, and meticulously checked.

The Patterns:

There are 19 patterns in the book.  These include a variety of fashionable corsets that will appeal to a broad range of costumers, as well as patterns for more specialised garments, including a nursing corset, a WWI munitions workers corset, and children’s corset-waists.  There is a even pattern for one of the support bras that fuller-busted costumers are so eager for – rejoice!

Corset Cutting & Making Review thedreamstress.com

While McNealy can’t be credited for the choice of corset patterns, as they are exactly the ones that were presented in the original book, they are the perfect balance of broad-spectrum popularity, and hard-to-find specialist patterns.

Each pattern includes additional images of similar advertised corsets, information on specialist aspects of making the corset, and discussions of the materials used, all logically and clearly organised:

Corset Cutting & Making Review thedreamstress.com

The patterns are all shown as front, side & back line drawings.  Best of all, there is a complete chart with finished measurements for each corset, seam types, and recommended boning types.

The patterns are shown both in a scaled gridded version, and then in a measurement-between version, as they were originally presented.  Plus, they are available to purchase as one-size-only digital patterns.

There are some issues with the construction of the earlier Edwardian reproduction corsets.  Some of the reproductions have a significant amount of wrinkling and warping, which is probably as a result of poor fabric choice.  However, it may also be caused by drafting deficiencies in the original patterns themselves.

Corset Cutting & Making Review thedreamstress.com

As McNealy acknowledges, we’re not sure where W.D.F Vincent sourced the original patterns.  The problem with working with historical magazine patterns is that they vary hugely in quality.  Especially with specialist items like corsets, which were rarely homemade, magazine patterns do not compare to manufactured garments in testing and fit.  It’s part of the reason I used a popular ready-made corset as the basis for the Rilla Corset: we know it was created by an experienced corset manufacturer, and was comfortable and well fitted enough to be a best seller for almost a decade.

I fully trust that McNealy has checked the patterns to ensure they fit together perfectly, but I don’t completely trust that every single one of the patterns in the book was a good one to start with.   This doesn’t detract from the value of the book as a research source, it’s just something to keep in mind when making up the corsets.  Any flaws in the original pattern will carry through to made up versions.  Even with more suitable fabrics, the Edwardian corsets may have the wrinkling and warping issues shown in the reproductions.

The Drawbacks:

I do have some quibbles with the book. The paper quality is one of them.  It just feels flimsy and cheap.  It would have been nice if the pages of the book were a slightly thicker, more robust, paper.  Ditto for the cover.  Given the calibre of the research inside, it’s a pity that the materials used don’t match that.  If there is ever a second printing, I’d happily pay an additional US$20 over the full price of the first printing for a second copy with better paper and cover (yep, it’s so good it would be well worth paying that much more for a more durable edition!).

I also can’t say I love the styling of the photographed reproduction corset.  It’s very 2010s and is likely to date the book.

Finally, in regards to the reproduction corsets, I really wish that some of the reproductions demonstrated a grommets-under-the-lace construction, rather than a grommets-through-the-lace construction.

Corset Cutting & Making Review thedreamstress.com

Grommets-through-the-lace is pretty unusual in extant Edwardian corsets.  It’s particularly unusual in ones with loose lace that hangs free of the corset – as most of the decorative lace edgings in the reproductions do.  Loose lace makes practical sense on a number of levels.  Delicate lace is less likely to be damaged by lacing cords if it hangs over them, rather than having the lacing cords cross it, and rub against it.  Lacing over grommets also allows the lace to be removed if it tears or soils.

It’s a small detail, but is the one place where I noticed a lack of attention to period accuracy and the most common construction methods of the time – including the ones specifically described in the book.  As many seamstresses will to use the reproduction corsets for visual reference, they are likely to replicate the anachronism.

The Verdict:

I’m going to go out on a limb here, and say that this is the best book* on corsetmaking since Norah Waugh’s Corsets & Crinolines.

The patterns are extremely detailed, and the supplementary material is excellent.  It’s not a hand-holding book, but the combination of original period materials with modern commentary is perfectly balanced.  The research is both clear and simple enough for the corset novice to learn from, and in-depth enough for the corset expert to learn from.

If you have any interest in corsetry, or in first-quarter-of-the-20th-century fashion, buy this book.  You will not regret it.

Get the book on Amazon, and buy the digital copies of the corset patterns on etsy.  

* In English.  I’ve read (and own) almost every one in English, but can’t speak for other languages.